Home Blog Page 26

APPARENT FINGERNAILS MISMATCH REVEALS BARACK OBAMA AIRPORT ‘FAMILY PHOTOS’ ARE LIKELY DIGITAL CREATIONS

0

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones  |  May 12, 2015

An apparent mismatch between fingernail sets on Barack Obama Sr.’s left hand, captured in two ‘photographs’ purportedly snapped inside a Honolulu International Airport terminal, reveals that at least one of the images is likely a digital creation, a joint investigation by The American Report and 1776 Channel has determined.

The exact dates on which the pictures were supposedly taken remains unknown, but the grainy color images seemingly portray Barack Obama Sr.’s alleged visit to Honolulu during the 1971 Christmas holiday season.

One image depicts young Barack Obama with his alleged father while a second snapshot portrays Obama Sr. posing with the President’s alleged mother Stanley Ann Dunham.

Striking differences between the appearance of the fingernails on Obama Sr.’s left hand raise troubling questions about the authenticity of the supposedly decades-old photographs.

The image featuring Barack Obama Jr. appears to have been distributed by Reuters while the image featuring Dunham appears to have been distributed by the Associated Press, with the names of those wire services appearing in the bottom left corners of identical images served by Google and Bing search engines.

American Thinker published a preliminary analysis of the two airport images in April 2014 in which author Shawn Glasco deduces that the images were likely photographed in late December 1971 or early January 1972. Glasco suggests that the images may have been captured on different days while noting that the photographer and Obama Sr. appear to have been standing in the same exact spots when both pictures were taken.

“It is inferred that the two photos were taken during Obama Sr.’s departure at Honolulu International Airport (HIA) – possibly in January 1972, or, due to the Christmas trees appearing in the background, as early as late December 1971.” – Shawn Glasgow, American Thinker, April 2014

A 1776 Channel investigation has concluded that the airport family gathering portrayed in these images of Barack Obama Sr.’s Honolulu arrival or departure likely never happened. Both airport images appear to have been manufactured, perhaps to propel the official narrative of Barack Obama’s family history as told in his memoir “Dreams from My Father.”

Barack Obama Sr. is wearing the same suit and tie in both images, yet has completely different looking left ‘hands’.

The fingernails depicted as belonging to Barack Obama senior in the photograph with young Obama appear to be manicured or possibly even deformed. The tips of those fingers appear white and mildly resemble the fingernails of patients suffering from a medical condition known as ‘nail clubbing’ or ‘clubbed fingers’.

The fingernails depicted as belonging to Barack Obama senior in the photograph with Stanley Ann Dunham appear healthy, in stark contrast to the photo in which Obama Senior has his ‘left arm’ wrapped around young Barack.

The only remotely-plausible explanation for the white fingernail tips is some sort of finger-tip bandages applied as a result of Obama Sr.’s first car accident in Kenya. The bandages scenario would require the presumptions that Obama’s fingertips were injured, that the images were photographed on different days, that Obama Sr. wore identical outfits each day, that he stood in precisely the same spot for each photograph, and that he removed the bandages between the time the photographs were taken.

Images contain additional anomalies

Additional anomalies detected within the airport terminal images suggest that both images were likely assembled using a raster graphics editor computer application such as Adobe Photoshop.

The faces of all three individuals seen in the foreground of the images, Obama Sr., Obama Jr., and Stanley Ann Dunham, appear to have been photographed under different lighting conditions, suggesting that the images may be composites.

Artifacts and distortions observed along the edges of Barack Obama Sr. suggest masking problems during the creation of composite images. These include the ‘halo’ effect and distortions in the blending and ‘feathering’ of the human subject with the background.

There are also proportional problems, such as the similarity in size of the heads of Barack Obama Sr. and Jr. and the small, distant appearance of the airline agent(s) behind the counter.

The positions of Barack Obama Sr.’s left ‘arms’ appear unnatural in both images. His arm is wrapped around Obama Jr. in one image and around Dunham in the other image.

Obama Sr.’s right arm appears unnaturally narrow in the photograph with Dunham.

The airline agents behind the counter appear to possibly be the same person, but the different looking watches worn on each agent reveal that they are perhaps two different individuals.

 

The image of Barack Obama Sr. with Stanley Ann Dunham features Christmas tree lights which cover part of Obama Sr.’s right cheek, revealing poorly-blended masking.

An anomaly discovered within the blue interchangeable sign hanging from a metal L-shaped pole adjacent to the counter inside the airport terminal is the sign’s ‘San Francisco’ lettering: Each white letter appears to be aligned along the Y-axis and identical in height to the other letters.

The laws of perspective appear to be absent, suggesting that the letters may have been individually imported into the image.

The Honolulu airport ticket lobbies during the 1960s featured check-in counters with metal poles from which interchangeable signs were hung to identify the current city. These were equivalent to modern LED displays which electronically identify flight numbers and cities.

The sign hanging above the counter behind Barack Obama Sr. and Jr. reads ‘San Francisco.’

Identifying the specific airport terminal seen in the Obama family images

The ‘San Francisco’ sign is only one anomaly that opens up the possibility that the airport terminal featured in the image is not the Honolulu International Airport. The airport terminal could even be located outside of the United States.

A black and white photograph of the Pan American Airways ticket lobby inside the Honolulu International Airport’s old terminal, as it appeared in 1960, reveals many similarities to the terminal in the Obama airport photos, yet there a stark differences as well.

After reviewing available historical photos 1776 Channel was unable to confirm which specific airport terminal the snapshots were purportedly taken in. The Honolulu International Airport has long featured both overseas and inter-island terminals, and has undergone many changes over the years as a result of new construction projects.

The Hawaii International Airport ceased operations at the old terminal in 1962 when it opened a brand new overseas terminal.

The Pan-Am ticket lobby seen below was located in the old terminal which ended operations in 1962 according to the Hawaii Department of Transportation’s Airport Division official website.

The counters in the old terminal are similar but not identical to those seen in the Obama family photos supposedly taken in 1971. The metal poles from which city signs hang in the old Pan Am terminal are virtually identical to those seen in the Obama family photos.

The old Pan Am lobby features windows that are not seen in the Obama family photos.

A lighted sign inside the airport terminal seen in the Obama family photos appears to read ‘Philippine Airlines.” Philippine Airlines has provided scheduled service to Honolulu since the 1950s, but also flies from Manila to Jakarta and other destinations.

The man standing in front of the counter on the far left side of the image featuring Barack Obama Sr. and Jr. appears to be wearing non-western clothing, perhaps including an Indonesian-style fez hat, and also appears to have a beard.

Possible media obfuscation

A version of the photograph “Barack Sr. & Jr.” published on the internet by the Chicago Tribune was cropped at the bottom in such a way that the fingernails are not visible. The top and sides of the Chicago Tribune photograph do not appear to have been cropped.

 

COPYRIGHT 2015 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES

Hillary’s Resume – Hillary hopes you have forgotten. Have you?

1

by Diane Rigali, 2008

Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her “record,” which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady – or “co-president” – and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes:

– As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Pat Moynahan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would “demonize “anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn’t even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party.  (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.)

– Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General.  Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno.  Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as “my worst mistake.”

– Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier’s radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn.

– Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned,

Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

– Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. (FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene Confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1996 both the drug use and Hillary’s involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years.)

– In order to open “slots” in the White House for her friends the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for “gross mismanagement” and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime – mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours.

– Another of Hillary’s assumed duties was directing the “bimbo eruption squad” and scandal defense; she urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.

—- She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

—- Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all.

—- And Bill lost his law license for lying under oath to the grand jury.

—- And Bill was impeached by the House.

—- And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” 56 times under oath).

– Hillary accepted the traditional First Lady’s role of decorator of the White House at Christmas, but in a unique Hillary way. In 1994, for example, The First Lady’s Tree in the Blue Room (the focal point each year) was Decorated with drug paraphernalia, sex toys, and pornographic ornaments, all personally approved by Hillary as the invited artists’ depictions of the theme, “The Twelve Days of Christmas.”

– Hillary wrote “It Takes a Village,” demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint.

– Hillary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother’s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support.

– Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen.

– In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the “woman card” by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her.

– Hillary’s husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary’s correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.)

– As the junior Senator from New York , Hillary has passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11.

– Hillary’s one notable vote, supporting the plan to invade Iraq , she has since disavowed.

Quite a resume, isn’t it? Sounds more like an organized crime family…

Support Stand Up America and its America First Project and The Glacial Forum

2

 SUA Banner

MG Paul Vallely’s Message for 2015

To all my friends, supporters and all who are Americans First,
MG Paul E. VallelyWe continue to witness America at a crossroads. Our country has been ‘fundamentally changed’ for the worse by the forces of the Progressives, the Socialists, the elites, the entrenched power brokers, the main stream media, and the supporters of our enemies. I cannot stand by idly nor should you. 2015 is a pivotal year for our country and will present challenges and threats that will be unparalleled in our history.

The new members of Congress must ensure they do not align themselves with the Establishment politicians but maintain their individuality and pledge to be “Americans First” for which they were elected over partisan political parties. We must take back our nation; re-establish and restore the Republic and our way of life. We must re-double our efforts now in 2015 to ensure success on the long road back to the ideals our forefathers laid before us. We truly need new leadership in all branches of our government.

We must peer into our souls and find the strength to Stand Up and be Americans first once again, to shun the mechanisms of power and party, and to support leaders who act first as Americans. We must cast aside those who lead only for personal gain, power, and party.

Please join me today and support our efforts at Stand Up America (founded in 2005 because we were witnessing the accelerating decline of America; the dismantling of our Constitution, and the destruction of the very fabric of our society).

Our mission has been to educate and inform Americans and others to uncover and expose wrong doing and focus on the ‘Realities’ of the world and help right our ship of state based upon constitution. To do this, I need your help. WE must restore the Republic.

Since Obama was first elected, our diplomatic and military influence, power, reputation is at a new low around the world. The morale and readiness of our Military has now hit dangerous levels. Vladimir Putin, the Mullahs of Iran and the Radical Jihadists of the Islamic State are on the offensive.  Iran continues its destiny to be the hegemonic power of the Middle East.  Leading from behind is for “losers”

China is challenging everyone in the Pacific over islands, international shipping lanes, and its economy will pass our own as the world’s greatest this year. And yes, Al Qaeda and ISIS are alive and well as they and the Muslim Brotherhood march across the world in their global Caliphate efforts.

Obama is Giving us the Finger… it’s actually the ISIS Salute

4

The country certainly is on fire.

Whether it’s Baltimore, Maryland or Garland, Texas, anarchists are out in force. Is it spring fever? The natural warmth of the season exciting emotions so hot that they burn… well, cars and buildings.

In Baltimore, rioting and destructive “protestors” took to the street after the so-called Mayor gave them license and a “space to destroy” in the city. After a night of devilish inferno, 144 cars were torched, 200+ businesses were destroyed, and 15 structures were set aflame by gangland arsonists given the reputed respectability of civil rights protesters by a fork-tongued public official.

The Chicago-based cult known as the Nation of Islam, among the most successful prisons gangs since the 1950s, was there to help along the violence. Baltimore exemplifies the pattern of deviant behavior brought to courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama.

Here is how Obama reacted to Baltimore, which had just been subjected to state-sponsored arson. Thus spoke Zarathustra: “And one burning building will be looped on television over and over and over again, and the thousands of demonstrators who did it the right way I think have been lost in the discussion.”

For those of us who still cling to our common sense, it’s only expected that violent mob rule in the middle of downtown Baltimore would overshadow peaceful demonstrators causing no trouble.

Meanwhile in Garland, Texas, two American jihadis traveled down from Phoenix, Arizona to crash a Mohammed cartoon contest with guns and bombs. In what will go down as the first ISIS attack on America soil, the Texas police saved the day. The two terrorists, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, were regular attendees at a Phoenix mosque. (Not for nothing, the Nation of Islam’s founder, Elijah Mohamed, purchased a sprawling home in Phoenix in 1961. They’ve had a prominent base there ever since.) Simpson was on the FBI terrorist watchlist and had been released from custody by an Obama-appointed judge.

I remember as a child they used to pass out crayons at Friendly’s so we could draw on the paper tablecloth. Now I guess a few wrong strokes with a Crayola is enough to get you killed. Imagine these people, would you? But I digress.

The targets at the Draw Mohammed event included Geert Wilders, the most prominent anti-Islamic invasion politician in Europe. He’s someone who speaks truth about the existential threat to Western civilization posed Islamic jihad. There is an ongoing genocide in the Middle East as the Islamic State is busy liquidating Christians and other ethnic and religious minorities. They’re also enthusiastically killing Muslims who don’t eagerly participate in the endless carnage.

Geert sees the reality across the Mediterranean in Libya, in Syria, and in Iraq. He realizes that Europe will share this fate if something is not done soon. Because he defends Europe, Geert is a prime target.

Also targeted at this gathering of first amendment and liberty supporting Americans were Pamela Geller, who was hosting the event, and Robert Spencer. To say nothing of their incredible bravery, Geller and Spencer are two of the most prolific popularizers and intellects who helped to shape the modern American understanding of Islam.

The two Garland assassins, despite being armed with assault rifles and wearing body armor, were thankfully shot and killed by a traffic cop with his pistol. The man was hired to provide additional security for the event. God bless him and God bless Texas.

Obama is yet to directly address the foiled attack. Press Secretary Josh Earnest squeaked out “There is no act of expression, even if it’s offensive, that justifies an act of violence.”

Well thanks, Josh. There was no mention of ISIS. No mention of the explosion in Islamic terrorism under Obama’s watch. No mention of open borders. No mention of the insane, murderous hatred of people drawing cartoons.

Finally, in Queens, New York on Sunday, another cop was shot and later died from the injuries. He was just 25 years old.

To recall, in December last year, a member of the Black Guerilla Family gang assassinated two NYPD officers. This Black Guerilla Family is the same gang now rioting in Baltimore, and is an affiliate of the Nation of Islam. And the killer was previously employed by the Islamic Society of North America, the largest Muslim Brotherhood umbrella organization of the United States.

Where are the calls to stop the Islamic terrorism that is now burning our cities, killing our cops, and attempting political assassinations? Where is the Congress on this? Where is the media?

What has infected the body politic?

Here’s a guess, spelled out in pictures. Obama isn’t on our side. He’s sides with the arsonists.

Exhibit 1: Below: A picture of ISIS giving their 1-finger salute. (Apologies if you’re upset easily by severed heads. This is now the norm in Syria, Iraq, and Libya.)

isis heads

Exhibit 2: A picture of Brooklyn College students giving their ISIS 1-finger salute, as they praised the Islamic State during a Pamela Geller speech.

brooklyn college isis

Exhibit 3: Below: Obama giving his 1-finger salute, as he walked off stage at an African summit at the State Department.

obama isis salute

A closer look - notice the faces in the background
A closer look – notice the faces in the background

A special thanks to Denise Simon at Founders Code for unearthing so many of the critical facts around these riots in Baltimore.

P.S., here is my late submission for the Draw Mohammed contest.

ceci n'est pas un potus

Betrayal Papers: Part VI – The Chicago Connection

8

This, the sixth and final installment of The Betrayal Papers, will explore various projects, schemes, and associations that tie Obama and his associates together.  A preponderance of these project are based out of Chicago, the crossroad of the global Left, Islamic “civilization jihad,” and the Communist mafia.  The themes to observe in each case are deception, greed, and power.

To have any chance to retain our freedoms and personal safety, we must recognize the depth of the treason from within; we must name the perpetrators and conquer them before they end America.

But first, three profiles of key Obama operatives, and one Maurice Strong.

Continue

Betrayal Papers: Part V – Who is Barack Hussein Obama?

15

Introduction

The Betrayal Papers have thus far investigated and explained the Obama administration and their alliance with the international terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. The articles analyzed several aspects of White House policy, foreign and domestic, and compared them to the objectives of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Parts V and VI will explore the personal ties that bind Obama, as well as the progressive American left, to the Muslim Brotherhood.

This is a portrait of a conspiracy that has reached unprecedented heights of global control.

“A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”

Has there ever been a president whose personal history is so murky, so questionable, and so baffling? All one must do is recall the allegations, still open for debate and research, that checker Obama’s background. Laid out below are some of these allegations, not to be proved or disproved, but to remind the reader that Obama’s personal history is replete with question marks.

Continue

Betrayal Papers: And the Press Says Nothing…

1

The first four parts of The Betrayal Papers have presented a nearly unfathomable scenario: a takeover of the country by a foreign, hostile party. (See Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV.) This supplemental article addresses the problem of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the nation’s capital and throughout the American establishment.

The United States of America, primarily through the political left and Democrat Party, has been virtually colonized by the Muslim Brotherhood.  Also known by their Arabic name, Ikhwan, they are a totalitarian, terrorist Islamic group that seeks our destruction because we are a free people.

We witness the Muslim Brotherhood’s planned destruction of America in many areas of contemporary life. A purposefully weak economy fails to produce the capitalist dynamism that has defined America for generations, and many millions remain unemployed.  Abroad, the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of American foreign policy instigated and backed the failed “Arab Spring,” which may ultimately result in Iranian domination of the Middle East.  We feel their suffocating effects on our democracy every day, as our freedoms, traditions, opportunities, and rule of law slip away.  The people suffer as prices continue to rise and the public sinks into a bottomless pit of debt.

Continue

Onward, to Defeat!

0

Will America’s war against ISIS be the first we enter with the intention of losing? On Tuesday, Breitbart.com carried an extremely salacious piece of news that, judging by the relatively small number of comments, went right over the heads of most readers. Reported Breitbart:

“The Obama administration is revamping its efforts to combat Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) propaganda. ISIS and its supporters produce “as many as 90,000 tweets and other social media responses every day,” reports The New York Times. An empowered Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, currently a small component of the U.S. State Department, will spearhead the new campaign to fight the ISIS propaganda machine. Rashad Hussain, a Muslim American with close ties to the White House, will replace Alberto Fernandez, the center’s director, according to The Times.”

The article goes on to cite several curious parts of Mr. Hussain’s biography that place him in close proximity to the Muslim Brotherhood. For the uninitiated, the Brotherhood is an international totalitarian organization which seeks to establish a global Islamic state (i.e., Caliphate) … just like ISIS, whom Hussain is supposed to be battling (in cyberspace, that is). We’ll soon add some more color to Mr. Hussain’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliate groups in the United States, but first a few comments regarding the absurdity of social media “warfare” with savage headchoppers.

How Not to “Fight” a Fake War

It has been a surprise to many in America how well-produced, sophisticated, and professional ISIS’s media campaigns have been. Certainly, the influx of western jihadis have given them sufficient talent and technological know-how to put together their slick slaughter videos and catchy Twitter memes. Lest you forget about their savagery for even a day, the news media and Twitter will shove it right back into your face. Which, considering our government’s capabilities, raises more than a few question about the actual strategy to defeat ISIS. The U.S. government and social media platforms are masters at censorship. Post something highly offensive on Facebook or on Twitter and these companies will, more likely than not, remove it. There is photo recognition software that surely can be programmed to detect severed heads and black Shahada flags, and immediately flag them (no pun intended) for review. And there are a thousand ways that government internet monitoring can track activity online and cripple the user. Just ask Edward Snowden. Just ask Sharyl Attkisson. Finally, remember that Facebook Turkey recently conceded to censor Turkish citizens who criticized Islam (and, more than likely, their fascist leaders, Recep Erdogan). In conclusion, if Obama and the geniuses who are allegedly fighting ISIS were serious about winning the cyberwar, they’d just implement the tools we all know they have at their (literal) fingertips and shut them down. But they don’t. Of course, if the same people were serious about winning the actual war (read: killing ISIS, not retweeting them to death), they’d also be doing just that. Instead, they’ve been ordering air strikes that have been described as “pin-pricks” since August, and while they dither ISIS has gained control of massive amounts of additional territory in Syria.

Deliberately Surrendering to the Headchoppers and Child Killers

oic-rec-rashadAll of this begs the question, what is the Obama administration doing with ISIS? It should be remembered that this same administration armed and trained Syrian rebels in Qatar. Only then did the world get “ISIS.” This brings us back to Obama’s new propaganda chief against ISIS, Rashad Hussain. As noted by Breitbart, in December 2013 the Egyptian political magazine Rose El-Yousef profiled Hussain as one of six Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators in the Obama administration. At the time, the Investigative Project on Terrorism wrote of Hussain that he “maintained close ties with people and groups that [Rose El-Yousef] says comprise the Muslim Brotherhood network in America.” That’s an understatement. Here’s a healthy dose of facts pertaining to Hussain’s role in the Obama administration and his association with Muslim Brotherhood organizations in the United States:

  • Hussain was appointed Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Countries by Obama in February 2010.
  • In 2013, Hussain met with Abdullah Bin Bayyah at the White House. Bayyah is a Vice President of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS). IUMS is headed by Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who is banned from entering the United States.
  • In 2013, Hussain was a Forum Speaker at the U.S.-Islamic World Forum, held in Doha, Qatar. This event is co-hosted by the Brookings Saban Center, and the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  • In 2012, Hussain attended the U.S.-Islamic World Conference in Doha, Qatar. With him were future Presidential Chief-of-Staff Denis McDonough, Imam Mohamed Magid (President of the Islamic Society of North America, ISNA), and Sheikh Abdallah bin Bayyah.
  • In May 2009, Mr. Hussain was one of the speakers at a Leadership Summit of the Council for Advancement of Muslim Professionals (CAMP). Many of the sponsoring organizations of that event are tied to the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood including Islamic Relief, Amana Mutual Funds, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), and the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding. (From GlobalMBWatch.com)
  • In 2008, Hussain co-authored a paper for the Brookings Institution, Reformulating the Battle of Ideas: Understanding the Role of Islam in Counterterrorism Policy.   This paper explicitly calls for the American government not to reject political Islam, but to utilize Islamic scholars and Islamic “policymaking” to reject “terrorism.” It also recommends that “policymakers should reject the use of language that provides a religious legitimization of terrorism such as ‘Islamic terrorism’ and ‘Islamic extremist.’” (Brookings has taken millions of dollars from the Muslim Brotherhood government of Qatar.)
  • In 2004, Hussain spoke at a Muslim Students Association’s (MSA) conference in Chicago. There he defended Sami al-Arian, a Palestinian activist who had been indicted by the Department of Justice for racketeering, calling it a “politically motivated persecution.”

Dissembling and Procrastination from Obama and his Puppets

In October, former CIA Chief and Secretary of Defense (both positions held under Obama) Leon Panetta expressed what should have been treated as an incredible opinion. The war against ISIS, Panetta stated, would be a “30-year war.” Let’s state the obvious: if you’re planning a 30-year war, are you planning victory, or a prolonged, dragged out, and humiliating defeat? The Nazis were defeated in much less than 30 years’ time, and ISIS right now is no German Wehrmacht. Not even close… not yet, anyway. That stupefying statement by an Obama-appointed public figure, as unbelievable as it was, was actually trumped this week by State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf. Harf, speaking after the world had recently witnessed the burning alive of a Jordanian pilot and the mass beheadings of Coptic Christians in Libya, claimed that the United States could “not kill ourselves out of his war. We need in the medium and longer term to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it is lack of opportunity for jobs.” ISIS certainly seems to believe they can kill themselves out of this war, whether the murdered are men, women, or children. But not according to the U.S. Department of State. Instead, to defeat ISIS, Libyans need jobs (or something, right Ms. Harf?). This is just too ironic, considering that the Obama administration is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, and there are a record number of Americans long-term out of work.

How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love Jihad

Americans aren’t all that familiar with Islam, jihad, honor killings, or the Muslim Brotherhood. According to the most recent U.S. Census, less than one million people in the United States speak Arabic at home. So, maybe it makes sense to listen to the government of Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928, when it states publicly that ISIS is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. The shock value here is minimized when one remembers that Al Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram, and the Taliban are all Muslim Brotherhood spinoffs. Then again, other spinoffs of the Brotherhood include CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, and the MSA. Rashad Hussain, the chief architect of a bogus cyberwar strategy against ISIS, is a well-known associate of these groups going back more than a decade. It’s a matter of public record. Not even in 30 years will this “strategy” defeat ISIS. It’s not designed to. It’s designed to defeat us. As an infamous 1991 memo of the Muslim Brotherhood stated, “The Ikhwan (i.e., Muslim Brotherhood) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Obama consistently defends Islam, yet has no problem lecturing Americans about the Crusades (which ended long before Columbus sailed to the Americas). If we the people don’t get serious about stopping this modern day jihad soon, the sabotage from within will soon be complete.

Obama Welcomes Barbarians with Open Gates

0

WARNING: The links to violent images, courtesy of Mexican drug cartels and al Qaeda, are disturbing.  Proceed with caution. This weekend, you could practically hear gasps of horror from your neighbors as chilling pictures and videoemerged of mass murders being committed by ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria).  The jihadi group, which has conquered a number of cities in Iraq and now has its sights on Baghdad, lined up captured Iraqi military prisoners, laid them in a ditch, and then shot the defenseless men to death using AK47s.  ISIS has reportedly executed thousands of prisoners in a similar manner.  So much for Iraqi liberation, huh? To be sure, the images out of Iraq are enough to make you lose your lunch.  But if ISIS has managed to cause a public outrage, it is somewhat surprising.  For this sort of mass murder occurs with frequency in Mexico, practically unnoticed by the denizens north of the border.  Referencing the Wikipedia article on the Mexican Drug War, since December 2006 until the present time, more than 100,000 Mexicans have been murdered as a result of cartel violence.  Mexican authorities routinely discover mass graves – see here, and here, for example.  Much like jihadis, who slaughter their prisoners in a way reminiscent of livestock (halal) slaughter, Mexican cartels are fond of mass executions using lead (“plomo”), as well as decapitations (see here, too).   Although the Wikipedia article chronicles the violence beginning in 2006, the present-day Mexican cartels have long histories, most going back to the 1990s and earlier. It is instructive to compare the response of the neighboring nations of Iraq and Mexico.  Iran responded to Iraq’s descent into barbarism by activating their military.  In contrast, Obama’s policies on illegal immigration and border security have been alarmingly lackadaisical.  He has looked to Mexico, one of the most corrupt and violent states in the entire world, and opened America’s gates wide. Consider some top level data and anecdotes regarding illegal immigration from South America under Obama.

  • The numbers of illegal immigrants entering the United States from Mexico and other central American countries, such as Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala,  are staggering: authorities in Texas estimated more than 35,000 illegal crossings in each month.
  • Despite the administration claiming that they are deporting more illegal immigrants than ever, this is due to a change in how they are counting. Deportations have in fact plummeted.  In 2011, ICE deported only 715,495, the lowest number since 1973.
  • In 2010, unions representing Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued votes/resolutions of “no confidence” in Obama and the ICE Director, for implementing policies that have made the border less secure.
  • The administration is now funding attorneys to counsel illegal immigrants on how to avoid deportation.  Talk about an incentive to cross the border illegally.
  • The recent flood of “unaccompanied alien children” (UAC) from countries such as El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala has led the administration to create shelters in far off communities.  The government estimates that 60,000 UACs will cross the border this year.  While the administration officially remains silent on where these children are going, they have been sent to states such as Texas, Massachusetts, and Oklahoma.
  • Under existing immigration laws, the children will likely be able to stay legally in the United States.

Knowing that levels of violence in South America, mostly a function of drug cartels that have achieved state capture, the legal and moral case for these children to declare asylum is strong.  Yet as documentary filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch explained on Megyn Kelly, the children refugees are functioning as a distraction to the real purpose of this cross-border surge: the importation of cartels.  The entire segment on Megyn Kelly is worth a watch.  If for nothing else, to see how genuinely distraught, even spooked, the documentarian is by what he has witnessed firsthand on the southern border. With numbers as large as these – 35,000 per month, 60,000 children this year – there is no reasonable expectation that these people can be processed properly.  Background checks, health checks (for disease), security checks – the normal procedures for immigration – are just not feasible on this scale.  Simply put, that means that among these “refugees,” there are violent criminals, vectors of communicable disease, rapists,murderers, and gang members of every variety. Why write an article on Iraq, Latin American drug cartels, and the Mexican-American border?  No, this isn’t Mad Libs.  The tie that binds here is narcotics.  This rest of this article will explore the similarities and the coincidences of interests between al Qaeda and Mexican and Latin American drug cartels.  In such a light, the Obama-encouraged invasion of illegal immigrants into the American interior, which has been ongoing for years but is reaching a critical level this summer, is highly unnerving. When Americans think of the Middle East, they usually think Israel, Palestine, religious wars, terrorism, etc.  But few appreciate how permeated the Middle East is with drugs, and how these drugs are related to terrorism and politics in the region.  Indeed, in March 2012, the academic journal Terrorism and Political Violence published a special issue dedicated to the relationship between organized crime and terrorism.  A series of essays details the overlapping interests of drug cartels and political terrorists.  For the quickest explanation what brings these types together, one needs only to identify the common trait between a good terrorist, and a good cartel leader: the ability to murder, whenever, wherever, without hesitation or regret. Notable examples of terrorist organizations that have turned into drug cartels include the FARC of Colombia, responsible for a sizable chunk of coca growing (for processing into cocaine), and the PKK of Turkey and Syria, who are intimately linked to the heroin trade in conjunction with the Russian mob.  The nature of a terrorist political insurgency, operating across borders and organized by cells, makes them ideally suited to function as traffickers.  And the money provided to terrorists by narcotics sales is more than enough to fund their meager operational models; car bombs don’t carry the same price tag as high tech drones. As for the cooperation between Mexican/Latin American gangs and various al Qaeda groups, there is evidence in several forms.

  • Qatar, a terrorist sponsor state and critical country for the Muslim Brotherhood, was reportedly set to invest USD $100 million in Mexican tourism last year.  The specific region in for this planned investment was Quintana Roo, the north eastern side of the Yucatan peninsula.  In addition to serving as a home for beautiful wildlife, the tide at Quintano Roo is known to carry dope ashore. Additionally, Quintana Roo borders Belize, which over the past several years has burgeoned as a significant transshipment point for narcotics in and out of Latin America, and in 2009 issued a passport to Anis Ibrahim.
  • Anis is the brother of Dawood Ibrahim, the notorious underworld boss of Pakistan and India.  Dawood’s D-Company syndicate profits from Taliban-grown opium, which is made into heroin and shipped around the world.  The main transporters for Afghan heroin are the National Logistics Cell, a Pakistani state-owned (Inter-Services Intelligence, aka ISI) trucking company, which is in a strategic partnership with Qatar and contracted by NATO.  (Yes, you read that correctly – NATO.)  Ibrahim has reportedly pledged 30% of his earnings to fund terror.
  • Doha, the capital of Qatar, was identified as a transit point for Latin American drugs.  In 2011, shipping from Argentina into Doha was exposed as a route for cocaine to enter the Gulf.
  • Latin American cocaine is entering Europe via Africa more than ever before.   Strange findings like Le Boeing de la Coke, a Boeing 707 found torched in Mali after being filled with cocaine in Venezuela, confirm that the trans-Atlantic narco trade is alive and well.  The main narcotics trafficker/smuggler in Mali, and the likely recipient of La Coke en le Boeing, is al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).
  • Guinea-Bissau, a small Portuguese speaking country on the horn of Africa, has become “Africa’s first narco-state,” and it is al Qaeda who moves the shipments of Latin America origin across the Maghreb and into Europe.
  • In 2011, a Mexican film was released called Saving Private Perez.  Plot to this knee-slapper?  ”A Mexican crime lord is forced by his mother to plan a suicidal rescue mission to find his lost brother in the most unexpected place on Earth… [Irak].”  Perhaps this movie trailer says more than we want to know about the toxic relationship between Latin America and the Middle East today.
  • MS13, a California-based gang primarily made up of ethnic Salvadorans, filmed themselves in Syria, dressed in Hezbollah garb, fighting alongside the Assad regime, contra (pun intended) al Qaeda.

Finally, when thinking about this federally sanctioned invasion of drug dealers with direct links to al Qaeda, keep in mind that the United States is in the midst of one of the worst heroine epidemics in our history.  A Delaware newspaper writes, “The United States is in the grips of one of the worst heroin epidemics in its history, due in part to a flood of cheap doses of the drug, which can be had for as little as $4 apiece, ordered on dark corners of the Web and delivered to your front door in the suburbs. In some regions, heroin is deemed “highly available” by local police in more than three times the number of communities as it was just seven years ago.” All over the country, especially along the Eastern seaboard, children in middle schools and high schools are getting addicted to the drug.  A few days ago in Phillipsburg, New Jersey, police busted Qaadir Muhammad and Karen Muhammad, who appear to be African Americans but have adopted Islamic names, with 500 bags of heroin.  Baltimore, Maryland has become the U.S. “U.S. heroin capital.” The source of this cheap heroine is Mexico.  There must be a glut, considering that a dose is down to a paltry $4.  But hey, it’s affordable for most tweens. Given the overwhelming evidence of trade between al Qaeda and Mexican/South American cartels and gangs, it is totally plausible to assume that al Qaeda prospers as a result of lax border security.  It only stands to reason that Qatar, who has been allied with al Qaeda in Libya and Syria (and now presumably Iraq) also reaps the benefits of a growing base of drug users. Doha, you might say, is the preeminent example of the terrorism-transnational crime nexus in the world today.  Ollie North claims that Qatar (possibly someone else) paid the Haqqani Network bribe money to free POW Bowe Bergdahl, and in exchange got custody of the Taliban 5. We now know that these Taliban leaders are living inluxury in Doha, complete with masseurs(!).  As Qatar has no problem welcoming in terrorists, so they have no compunction about profiting from the drug trade.  Indeed, Boko Haram of Nigeria, with seed money from Qatar, was set up as a “money making venture,” with business lines in kidnapping, slavery, and drug trafficking.  Already in a formal strategic alliance with the Taliban’s heroin traffickers (NATO subcontractor NLC), they last year stated their intention to invest USD $100 million in Mexican “tourism” in a region known for its mind-altering flotsam.  Reader, the pattern should be getting clearer. Who benefits from this amnesty?  It is not the citizens of the United States, who are having their communities flooded with immigrants of a different culture, most whom do not speak English, and too many who are confirmed criminals and cartel members.  The Obama-led refugee program is reminiscent of the Mariel boatlift in 1980, which welcomed thousands of Cuban criminals and mental patients onto our shores, and inspired the movie Scarface (cf.the blow). However, if your name is al-Thani, and your Kingdom is Qatar, what do you care if America is invaded by drug dealers?  What do you care if America’s children, infidels, are getting addicted to heroin in record numbers?  What do you care if Mexico and El Salvador have public safety records only marginally better than Syria?  You’re Tony Montana, and you’ve got “the money” (thanks to the drug trade), “the power” (because you’re protected by two massive American military bases, Al Udeid and As Sayliyah), and “the women” (whom you’re selling into sex slavery). There are many reasons to be outraged at this latest amnesty scheme, which may yet lead to civil unrest.  You don’t invade communities with questionable foreigners and expect it all to work out just fine.  But putting aside Obama’s penchant for creating chaos in everything he touches, the logical winners of this sham are the cartels.  And when it comes to cui bono from narcotics and related smuggling activities, the al-Thani family of Qatar, patrons to al Qaeda, should be considered as guilty as any Chapo or Pablo Escobar.

Crash Position

0

We received this analogy in a chain letter:

The pilot was locked out of the cockpit.

That phrase finally revealed the full horror of the crash of Germanwings flight 9525. Co-pilot Andreas Lubitz waited for the pilot to leave the cockpit, then locked the door to prevent his re-entry. After which Lubitz, for reasons unknown and perhaps unknowable, deliberately steered the jet into a harrowing 8 minute plunge ending in an explosive 434 mph impact with a rocky mountainside. 150 men, women and children met an immediate, unthinkably violent death.

Lubitz, in his single-minded madness, couldn’t be stopped because anyone who could change the jet’s disastrous course was locked out.

It’s hard to imagine the growing feelings of fear and helplessness that the passengers felt as the unforgiving landscape rushed up to meet them. Hard – but not impossible.

Because America is in trouble. We feel the descent in the pits of our stomachs. We hear the shake and rattle of structures stressed beyond their limits. We don’t know where we’re going anymore, but do know it isn’t good. And above all, we feel helpless because Barack Obama has locked us out.

He locked the American people out of his decision to seize the national healthcare system. Locked us out when we wanted to know why the IRS was attacking conservatives. He locked us out of having a say in his decision to tear up our immigration laws, and to give over a trillion dollars in benefits to those who broke those laws.

Obama locked out those who advised against premature troop withdrawals.

Locked out the intelligence agencies who issued warnings about the growing threat of ISIS.  He locked out anyone who could have interfered with his release of five Taliban terror chiefs in return for one U.S. military deserter.

And of course, Barack Obama has now locked out Congress, the American people, and our allies as he strikes a secret deal with Iran to determine the timeline (not prevention) of their acquisition of nuclear weapons.

Was Andreas Lubitz depressed, insane, or abysmally evil when he decided to lock that cockpit door and listen to no voices other than those in his head? Did he somehow believe himself to be doing the right thing?

The voice recordings from the doomed aircraft reveal that as the jet began its rapid descent, the passengers were quiet. There was probably some nervous laughter, confusion, a bit of comforting chatter with seatmates, followed by a brief period in which anxiety had not yet metastasized into terror.

It was only near the end of the 8 minute plunge that everyone finally understood what was really happening. Only near the end when they began to scream.

Like those passengers, a growing number of Americans feel a helpless dread as they come to the inescapable conclusion that our nation’s decline is an act of choice rather than of chance. The choice of one man who is in full control of our 8 year plunge.

A man who has locked everyone out.

– Author unknown

Editors note: We add that, though in both cases there is no “hard” proof, it is assumed that both the pilot and Obama were/are Muslim terrorists.

1...252627...30Page 26 of 30

EDITOR PICKS

POPULAR POSTS

POPULAR CATEGORY

© 2015 - 2022 THE AMERICAN REPORT