By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | September 27, 2019
The assault on President Trump by a partisan CIA operative and whistleblower who was placed in the White House to spy on the President is unparalleled in American history. While obstructionists roll out their latest hoax, the real whistleblower story has not been told. President Obama and his yet to be indicted, corrupt Praetorian Guard led by John Brennan and James Clapper, spied on all of America in order to deliver a death blow to the U.S. Constitution and steal our freedoms. Obama’s top intelligence officials spied on America for the purpose of blackmail and leverage with a secret super surveillance system called “THE HAMMER.”
Former U.S. military officials told The American Report that the foreign surveillance system known as “The Hammer,” built by CIA contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis L. Montgomery, saved the lives of U.S. troops engaged in the War on Terror. “THE HAMMER” kept Americans safe after 9/11, according to those military sources.
Those sources further stated that “THE HAMMER” was a foreign surveillance tool with multiple echelons of safeguards and sign-offs that logged the identities of all U.S. personnel who accessed the super-surveillance system, up to and including the President. Those safeguards were put in place to ensure that “THE HAMMER” was never misused and turned into a domestic surveillance system to spy on the American people, obliterating their Fourth Amendment constitutional rights.
In February 2009, under newly-elected President Barack Obama, John Brennan and James Clapper commandeered and repurposed “THE HAMMER” by expanding and transforming it from a foreign surveillance system into a private, parallel platform domestic surveillance system. That system was illegal.
Brennan and Clapper moved “THE HAMMER” to a new secret location less than twenty miles from the Obama White House, where they scaled it up and covertly operated it to spy on all of America.
Dennis Montgomery designed and built “THE HAMMER” to protect Americans, not to spy on them. What Brennan and Clapper were doing was in direct opposition to the original mission of “THE HAMMER.” Brennan and Clapper were doing exactly what the multiple echelons of safeguards and sign-offs were designed to stop.
Some conflate “THE HAMMER” with “HAMR.” According to Montgomery, “THE HAMMER” is the supercomputer operating system and the “HAMR” is the software exploit that runs off of “THE HAMMER.”
Montgomery was a prolific software designer and inventor. He not only developed and built “THE HAMMER,” but also developed technology for analyzing surveillance video from U.S. Air Force Predator drones remotely piloted from Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada.
Montgomery had also been the Chief Technology Officer, and Executive Vice President at Reno, Nevada-based defense contractor eTreppid Technologies LLC. Montgomery established eTreppid with his then-business partner Warren Trepp. ETreppid completed several successful years of lucrative defense contracts. Eventually, Trepp and Montgomery went their separate ways and reached a legal agreement on the terms of their separation.
Mueller’s FBI Supplied Computers For “The Hammer” Then Illegally Raided Montgomery And Seized His Property, Prompting Two Judges To Admonish The FBI; On Cue, The Mockingbird Media Swooped In To Destroy Montgomery’s Reputation
The absurdity of Montgomery’s career is that by the time certain elements inside the intelligence community teamed up with the Mockingbird Media in 2009 to paint Montgomery as a fraud who sold “hoax” technology to the CIA and the U.S. military, Montgomery was already back working as a government contractor for Brennan and Clapper.
Obama was in office and “THE HAMMER” was already underway.
Under FBI Director Robert Mueller’s direction, the FBI in 2006 had raided Montgomery’s Nevada home and storage units. According to U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie Cooke, Mueller’s FBI used illegally-obtained search warrants to raid Montgomery’s premises.
Painting Montgomery as a hoax in 2009 was nothing short of an insurance policy. Should Montgomery decided to talk, the intelligence community’s allies in the Mockingbird Media had already painted Montgomery as a fraud and put his veracity in question.
If Mueller’s use of illegally-obtained search warrants to go after Montgomery sounds reminiscent of the Obama administration’s illegal acquisition of FISA warrants in order to build the hoax FBI Trump Russian collusion case, that’s because it is.
The Mockingbird Media attacks on Montgomery began well after Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte had invoked the State Secrets Privilege (SSP) against Montgomery, which left Montgomery without the right to speak out on his own behalf. The SSP is essentially a government gag order and is typically invoked in order to protect state secrets, including national security secrets.
Montgomery remains under the SSP to this day, leaving him unable to defend himself and his reputation. And those who would continue to have at it knowing that Montgomery is muzzled.
The Mockingbird Media attacks against Montgomery began in 2009, not long after President Obama assumed office.
“They (the intelligence agencies) leaked false information about me in 2009 and 2011 to the press to discredit me in case their domestic surveillance programs ever became public,” Montgomery stated. “Somebody leaked my name to (New York Times reporter James Risen) saying that my work for the government didn’t work and so forth, which is ridiculous. My work saved lives…”
The last thing the Obama administration wanted was a bonafide American hero blowing the whistle on their illegal and unconstitutional domestic surveillance and blackmail activities.
Although John Brennan was involved with “THE HAMMER” in the early days of the project when it was still being used for foreign surveillance in Reno, Nevada, Brennan and James Clapper fully commandeered “THE HAMMER” in February 2009, relocating the system to Fort Washington, Maryland, just a hop, skip and a jump from the White House.
Brennan and Clapper fully weaponized “THE HAMMER” for illegal surveillance against Americans.
According to whistleblower Montgomery, Brennan and Clapper utilized “THE HAMMER” for “blackmail” and “leverage.” That is correct — blackmail and leverage — in the United States of America.
Zullo: “The Whistleblower Tapes” “Were Never Supposed To Be Released To The Public”
Audiotapes surreptitiously recorded by Mike Zullo of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Arizona became widely known as the “The Whistleblower Tapes.”
Although “The Whistleblower Tapes” were “never supposed to be released to the public,” they were inexplicably leaked in November 2015 from a federal court case presided over by U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow.
Former Maricopa County Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo said in 2019 that “back in, I guess it was 2015 or 16, whenever the audiotapes of Montgomery or Blixseth surfaced and they were erroneously released by the ACLU and publicized, they were never supposed to be released to the public…”
Tim Blixseth, another of Montgomery’s former business partners, can be heard on “The Whistleblower Tapes” revealing that “THE HAMMER” wiretapped Donald Trump “a zillion times.”
Montgomery: There Has Been A Wiretap On Donald Trump For Years
Dennis Montgomery says that there has been a wiretap on Donald Trump “for years.”
“THE HAMMER,” according to “The Whistleblower Tapes,” also collected surveillance data on 156 Article III judges, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the FISA Court, including former presiding FISA Court Judge Reggie Walton, members of Congress, and business leaders.
Montgomery recounted during a 2017 radio interview with his then-attorney Larry Klayman:
I provided to the FBI seventeen businesses of Donald Trump, including the Trump Tower, the Trump leasing programs, all of these different programs, and including Trump himself and the various family members that had been wiretapped under these programs. There has been a wiretap on Trump for years…
I was a CIA contractor both under John Brennan and under James Clapper and these individuals were running domestic surveillance programs in the United States collecting information on Americans…they collected everything they could find. Bank accounts, phone numbers, chats, emails, and they collected a massive amount of it under the Obama administration.
Again, according to Montgomery, Brennan and Clapper were utilizing “THE HAMMER” for domestic surveillance for the purposes of “blackmail” and “leverage.” Consider that, according to Montgomery, Brennan and Clapper were collecting Americans’ “bank accounts, phone number, chats, and emails” for use in the illegal surveillance state that they were creating.
Before President Obama appointed John Brennan as his CIA Director, Brennan worked in the Obama White House as Assistant to the President for Homeland Security. The CIA’s charter prohibits the spy agency from conducting operations inside the United States.
The Obama administration, under Brennan and Clapper, turned the powerful illegal super-surveillance technology of “THE HAMMER” against the American people, turning the United States into a Soviet-style police state worthy of the Stasi or the KGB.
Brennan voted for Communist Party USA (CPUSA) candidate Gus Hall in the 1976 presidential election, less than one year after the Vietnam War.
Brennan and Clapper were using “THE HAMMER” for blackmail and leverage to ensure a desired outcome.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ last-minute support for the Affordable Care Act and his eleventh-hour position reversal on the U.S. citizenship question on the U.S. Census also call into question the use of “THE HAMMER” for leverage to effect an outcome. “The Whistleblower Tapes” particularly cite Supreme Court Justice John Roberts as being under surveillance by “THE HAMMER.”
FBI Supplied Computers For “THE HAMMER”: Yet Another Chapter In The Ongoing Saga Of Robert Mueller
Montgomery developed “THE HAMMER” foreign surveillance tool in 2003. He operated “THE HAMMER” from eTreppid in Reno, Nevada using $1 million in computer equipment supplied by Robert Mueller’s FBI.
In addition to FBI Director Robert Mueller, three additional U.S. intelligence officials were named by Montgomery as being involved in the earliest days of the foreign surveillance tool “THE HAMMER”: John Brennan, CIA Director George Tenet, and Donald Kerr, the National Reconnaissance Office Director who became Deputy Director of National Intelligence.
Montgomery On “THE HAMMER”: “John Brennan Was There From The Beginning”
Brennan and Clapper transformed “THE HAMMER,” from a powerful, legal foreign surveillance tool, where it was being utilized to keep America safe after 9/11, into an even more powerful yet draconian tool for illegal domestic surveillance.
“John Brennan was there from the beginning,” Montgomery states.
“THE HAMMER,” in Reno, Nevada, was “off the grid and far from Congressional oversight,” Montgomery says.
Under Brennan’s direction, “THE HAMMER” system in Reno was rebuilt from a foreign surveillance system to one conducting illegal domestic surveillance.
In 2009, when “THE HAMMER” was relocated to Fort Washington, Maryland, under the auspices of Brennan and Clapper, FBI agents working for Robert Mueller were posted inside the Fort Washington Facility where “THE HAMMER” was operating. Mueller’s FBI not only provided the computers to rebuild “THE HAMMER” but also had FBI agents inside the Fort Washington facility where “THE HAMMER” was located.
While “THE HAMMER” at eTreppid ran on a $1 million computer system, the “THE HAMMER” set up in 2009 in Fort Washington at the start of President Obama’s first term ran on a $5 million supercomputer system that was twenty to thirty times more powerful than the original “Hammer” at eTreppid, according to Montgomery.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Cooke Admonished FBI For Using Deceptive Tactics To Obtain Search Warrant For FBI Raids On Montgomery Home And Storage Units, Orders FBI To Return Montgomery’s Property
Several years after Mueller’s FBI supplied the computers for “THE HAMMER” that Montgomery built, the FBI would begin a dogged pursuit of Montgomery for things Montgomery had that the FBI wanted – such as his computer source code.
The FBI was willing to cross the line into illegal activities in order to get from Montgomery what it wanted for itself.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke initially approved the 2006 FBI search warrants that allowed FBI agents to raid Montgomery’s home and storage units in Reno, Nevada, under the direction of then-FBI Director Robert Mueller.
FBI Special Agent Michael West not only filed falsified applications and falsified affidavits to search Montgomery’s Reno locations in 2006 but took the additional step of asking that the search warrants be sealed.
However, Judge Cooke later realized that FBI Special Agent West misled her with inaccurate warrant affidavits. Judge Cooke excoriated West and the FBI for violating Montgomery’s rights and demanded that the FBI return Montgomery’s seized property.
The evidence before this court compels the conclusion that SA West acted with callous disregard of Montgomery’s constitutional rights, which resulted in the improper search of Montgomery’s home and storage units, and the improper seizure of his property…
… he [FBI Special Agent West] prepared search warrant affidavits that are riddled with incorrect statements, edited documents, and uncorroborated conclusions, which caused this court to exercise its formidable power to authorize the government to search Montgomery’s home and storage units…
…IT IS ORDERED that Montgomery’s motion to unseal the search warrant affidavits (#21) is GRANTED, and Montgomery’s motion for the return of property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 4l(g) (#21) is GRANTED. Montgomery’s motion for the segregation and sealing of all attorney-client and trade secret material (#21) is DENIED AS MOOT, since the court has ordered the return of all seized property.
Federal Magistrate Judge Valerie Cooke, who had authorized the warrant, later reprimanded the FBI, and in particular FBI Special Agent Michael West, for misleading her and for violating Montgomery’s Fourth Amendment rights.
In the 2006 court order concerning the FBI’s search of Montgomery’s home and the seizure of his belongings, U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie Cooke wrote:
Had the court been apprised of the civil litigation between Trepp and Montgomery and the disputed facts summarized herein, it would have concluded- as the court does now- that there was no probable cause to issue a search warrant based upon the allegation of theft of trade secrets.
When FBI agents raided Montgomery’s Reno home, they handcuffed Montgomery to a tree. The FBI threatened Montgomery and his family.
According to Montgomery, FBI Special Agent West showed up at his house with 10 agents who had their guns drawn. Those very same tactics are becoming all too familiar in America – as Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, William Binney, and Kirk Wiebe can attest.
Montgomery The Whistleblower
In 2013, Montgomery decided to become a whistleblower.
Montgomery’s transition from CIA/FBI/NSA contractor to national security whistleblower took a physical toll on his health, ultimately leading to a stroke, according to Montgomery.
On the “Whistleblower Tapes,” which were recorded in approximately 2013, Tim Blixseth, one of Montgomery’s former business partners, can be heard stating:
He [Montgomery] filed eighteen whistleblower complaints with the inspector general of the Air Force, inspector general of the CIA, inspector general of the United States, (Attorney General Eric) Holder. He sent an actual letter to Obama, and to his private fax number, and how the hell he got it I don’t know … So, he got rejected 18 times.
Montgomery confirms that Blixseth’s account of the eighteen whistleblower complaints is correct.
Montgomery Goes To D.C. And Testifies To DOJ’s Deborah Curtis Regarding 47 Hard Drives Of “THE HAMMER” Evidence That Comey Buried — Why Has DOJ’s Curtis Not Spoken Out?
On August 1, 2014, Dennis Montgomery and his then-attorney Larry Klayman met with Senior U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia Royce C. Lamberth in Washington D.C. at the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse. Judge Lamberth formerly served as the Presiding Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court).
Also in attendance during the meeting were Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) “Cold Case Posse” volunteer Mike Zullo and MCSO detective Brian Mackiewicz, as well as Montgomery’s son-in-law who, according to Dennis Montgomery, escorted him on his trip to Washington D.C.
Montgomery presented Judge Lamberth with a 200-page document and one data disc.
Judge Lamberth immediately recognized some of the information Montgomery presented in the document as information that had previously come before him as a judge at the FISA court.
Judge Lamberth then confirmed Montgomery’s TS/SCI security clearance, Montgomery says.
Montgomery further states that Judge Lamberth accorded protection to Dennis Montgomery at the August 1, 2014 meeting.
Subsequently, Judge Lamberth proceeded to facilitate two limited immunity agreements for Montgomery. The agreements were struck in 2015 among Montgomery’s then-attorney Larry E. Klayman, Department of Justice Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, and FBI General Counsel James Baker.
Montgomery’s two limited immunity agreements were for production and testimony, respectively.
The production part of the partial immunity agreement consisted of Montgomery turning over 47 hard drives of information illicitly collected by “THE HAMMER” to the FBI’s Miami Field Office in Miramar, Florida on August 19, 2015. The 47 hard drives had been encrypted, though Montgomery turned them over to the FBI after they had been decrypted.
Referring to the data on the 47 hard drives he turned over to the FBI Montgomery later stated during his radio interview with Larry Klayman:
I produced 600 million pages. If you printed out each page it would be thirty miles high stacked one on top of another. The information is very sensitive information. They collected google searches, credit cards, phone records, images, pictures, anything and everything, and they did it for one reason: leverage. They didn’t know when, but they knew sooner or later they would need that information to use for those leverage against a person … The amount of information is mind-boggling, and I gave all of that to FBI Director Comey’s office.
The limited immunity agreement for testimony was offered in exchange for Montgomery being debriefed under oath by Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis and FBI officials in an FBI Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). Those FBI officials included Special Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett.
After the hard drives were verified, Montgomery received greater immunity and testified under oath in December of 2015 to DOJ Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis. Montgomery testified at the FBI Washington DC Field Office where he was debriefed by U.S. Assistant Attorney Deborah Curtis while being videotaped for over three hours. Also in attendance were Director James Comey’s top “right-hand men,” FBI Special Agents Barnett and Giardina.
“THE HAMMER” IS THE KEY TO THE COUP: Montgomery’s Handover Of Evidence And Testimony Leads Directly To Robert Mueller’s Trumped-Up Russian Collusion Investigation Team, The Prosecution Of General Flynn, — And To The Invisible Hands Of Strzok And Page
Interestingly, U.S. Assistant Attorney Deborah Curtis and FBI Special Agents William Barnett and Walter Giardina, three of the officials who conducted a 2015 classified debriefing of Montgomery after the FBI verified the 47 hard drives Montgomery had turned over to the FBI, went on to join Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump Russian collusion hoax investigation team.
According to Montgomery, ninety percent of those individuals targeted by the Mueller team had their information harvested by “THE HAMMER.” That information, including “Hammer” surveillance data collected on Roger Stone and General Michael Flynn, was stored in the 47 hard drives turned over to the FBI under Montgomery’s limited immunity agreements.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis Granted Montgomery Immunity For Hard Drives; Curtis Also Joined Special Counsel Mueller’s Team, Assigned To Flynn, Manafort, Butina, And Russian Troll Farm Cases
U.S. Assistant Attorney Deborah Curtis also went on to join the DOJ prosecution team in the General Michael Flynn case, the Paul Manafort case, the Maria Butina, and the case against against Russian nationals and Russian businesses accused of coordinating with the St. Petersburg-based “Internet Research Agency” troll farm to interfere with the 2016 election.
FBI Special Agents Giardina And Barnett Assisted DOJ Assistant U.S. Attorney Curtis With Debriefing Montgomery; Giardina, Barnett, and Curtis All Went On To Join Special Counsel Mueller’s Team and The Michael Flynn Case
FBI Special Agents William Barnett and Walter Giardina, both of whom were in the FBI SCIF with Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis to debrief Montgomery in 2015, also joined Mueller’s Trump Russian collusion investigation team.
Both FBI Special Agents Giardina and Barnett were part of the team investigating President Trump’s National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn.
Special Agent William Barnett accompanied the Flynn prosecution team in the courtroom.
“When Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, admitted in court last week that he lied to FBI agents about his contacts with the Russian government, prosecutors in that case were accompanied by FBI agent William Barnett” ABC News reported in December 2017. “Little is publicly known about Barnett” ABC stated.
Politico reported in 2018 “In 2015, Barnett debriefed former intelligence agency contractor Dennis Montgomery, who claimed to have information about illegal surveillance being conducted by the Obama administration.”
In the same article, Politico also reported that “Walter Giardina [is] part of the team investigating Flynn … Giardina also worked with Barnett on the Montgomery case in 2015.”
There is a question as to whether Mueller’s team appears to have coerced General Flynn into a guilty plea.
Flynn, it was later found, had not lied under oath, according to FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka.
Attorney Sidney Powell Steps In To Represent General Flynn
Attorney Sidney Powell, who is now representing General Flynn, says that the defense has not received FBI Special Agent Pientka’s original FBI FD-302 form from Flynn’s interview.
Powell wrote on December 16, 2018, in the Daily Caller:
Mueller has thumbed his nose at Judge Sullivan’s order. He produced only a 302 created by his own squad seven months later from his own agent’s interview of none other than the infamous, fired-for-bias, disgraced, Trump-loathing, former Agent Peter Strzok — the guy who swore he’d “stop” President Trump and devised “an insurance policy” with his mistress Lisa Page and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe in case Trump won the election. We are watching Mueller execute that insurance policy by the day.
The evidence indicates Mueller has destroyed or is suppressing Brady material. There was an original 302 created within five days — by FBI protocol — of the Jan. 24, 2016 ambush interview of General Flynn by two agents — Strzok and Special Agent Joe Pientka. It is mentioned in the Strzok-Page text messages and on page four of the recrafted 302 Mueller filed. Comey read the original 302 before he was fired.
It existed — as Grassley well knows. It was written by Agent Pientka, who also took extensive handwritten notes, whose name is redacted from Mueller’s filing, and who seems to have disappeared. Where are the original 302, his notes, and where is Agent Pientka? Grassley has been trying to get access to all three for almost two years.
Mueller’s filing confirms that Agent Pientka was assigned to take notes of the interview. Judge Sullivan’s order encompasses the production of those notes.
General Flynn’s Attorney Sidney Powell further states that she is seeking exculpatory evidence as well as a litany of Brady material that the prosecution has withheld.
Powell states she is seeking the never-released unredacted text messages of former Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division Peter Strzok and his purported paramour former FBI attorney Lisa Page.
“We still don’t have the unredacted Page Strzok text messages” Powell stated during the September 20, 2019 edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight on Fox News.
Redacted text messages between Strzok and Page released by the DOJ in April 2018 show that the pair was well aware of Dennis Montgomery.
Lt. General Thomas McInerney Broadcasts “THE HAMMER” Scandal Over America’s Airwaves, Warns That “The Whistleblower Tapes” Reveal Brennan and Clapper Illegally Spied On Trump “A Zillion Times”
On the evening of Sunday, March 19, 2017, U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney (Ret.) gave a live radio interview which he devoted entirely to a discussion of Dennis Montgomery, “The Whistleblower Tapes” and John Brennan and James Clapper’s use of “THE HAMMER” for illegal domestic surveillance against Donald Trump. General McInerney presented The American Report’s “Whistleblower Tapes” exposé live on air after receiving it from Admiral James A. “Ace” Lyons (Ret.).
Twenty-six minutes after General McInerney finished his radio interview about Montgomery and “THE HAMMER,” Peter Strzok and Lisa Page began texting that Sunday evening.
The first message Strzok and Paige exchanged was cryptic, seemingly coded.
When Strzok and Page exchanged a second text message later that Sunday evening, there was no doubt they were communicating about Dennis Montgomery.
Strzok and Page’s second text message specifically mentions Montgomery and Klayman, the very people that General McInerney was referencing during the radio broadcast. Strzok and Page, after specifically mentioning Montgomery and Klayman, wrote: “Best to say nothing.”
“I’m not going to respond to the whole group. The Klayman/Montgomery stuff in the email Jim just sent is utter BS. Best to say nothing and brief later if necessary.” – March 19, 2017, Strzok/Page text message sent hours after Lt. General Thomas McInerney went on air to discuss Brennan’s and Clapper’s secret surveillance system “THE HAMMER”
Comey Launched The Trump Russian Collusion Investigation The Very Next Morning After General McInerney Broadcasts “THE HAMMER” Story Over America’s Airwaves
The very next morning, Monday, March 20, 2017, FBI Director James Comey launched the Trump Russian collusion investigation that would soon expose the involvement of America’s intelligence community in the coup against President Trump.
Also on that same Monday morning, Comey lied before Congress and said that the FBI had no evidence to support President Trump’s accusation that President Obama had wiretapped Trump, even though FBI Director Comey had taken possession in 2015 of the 47 decrypted hard drives of proof from Dennis Montgomery.
On that same March 20, 2017 morning during which Comey launched the Russia collusion investigation, he also reportedly stated behind closed doors that the FBI had determined that FBI agents concluded that Michael Flynn did not lie to the FBI and did not violate the Logan Act.
FBI’s Baker Took Possession Of Montgomery’s 47 Hard Drives Of Evidence Of “THE HAMMER”; Next, Baker Went To Work Creating The Trump Russian Collusion Hoax
FBI General Counsel James Baker played a key role in setting the course for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s hoax Trump Russian collusion investigation.
Although FBI General Counsel Baker did not join Robert Mueller’s hoax Trump Russian Collusion team, Baker’s crafty hand can be seen nonetheless. Baker laid the groundwork that would lead to the appointment Special Counsel Mueller.
Baker planted the seeds of disinformation that would bloom into Mueller’s trumped-up $30 million Gordian knot of a tail-chasing investigation.
Baker received a copy of the repugnant and false Christopher Steele Russia dossier about the Russian “golden shower” prostitutes and Donald Trump from Baker’s “long-time friend” David Corn of Mother Jones. The Steele dossier was paid for by the Hillary Clinton Campaign.
Baker also received Trump Russia documents from Michael Sussmann, the Perkins Coie attorney who is linked to the DNC. Perkins Coie also represented Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
The Wall Street Journal reported on March 21, 2019:
Mr. Baker explains that top FBI leadership was told Justice Department attorney Bruce Ohr “had some type of relationship” with Mr. Steele and “that somehow through that mechanism . . . information was flowing to the FBI.” He says that his “longtime friend,” the liberal Mother Jones reporter David Corn, also fed the FBI the dossier. “I know that David was anxious to get this into the hands of FBI. And being the person at the FBI that he knew the best, he wanted to give it to me.” Mr. Baker admits that he “assumed” Mr. Corn got it from “Simpson or somebody acting on Simpson’s behalf.” He further admits a lawyer with ties to the DNC, Michael Sussmann, also passed along to Mr. Baker documents with Trump-Russia accusations.
The salacious nature of the dossier that FBI General Counsel James Baker passed on from David Corn was intended to create a feeding frenzy as it was leaked to the dependable Mockingbird Media in an effort to smear Donald Trump and set the course toward the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Baker’s scheme produced the intended results.
After Baker had approved Montgomery’s immunity agreements and subsequently dispatched FBI agents to Miramar Florida to take possession of Montgomery’s 47 hard drives of evidence in 2015, Baker then testified in October 2018 before congressional committees that Montgomery had provided the FBI with what Montgomery said is proof of unlawful domestic surveillance.
Baker testified that he had information from Whistleblower Montgomery that government officials wiretapped other government officials and other Americans.
In October 2018, Baker testified before a “joint investigation by the House Committee on the Judiciary and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform into decisions made and not made by the DOJ and the FBI regarding the 2016 Presidential election.”
Baker amended his October 3, 2018 day one testimony on October 18, 2018, day two of his testimony, thereby avoiding a perjury charge.
Baker stated that he suddenly “remembered” that he had information from whistleblower Montgomery and Montgomery’s then-attorney Larry E. Klayman that U.S. government officials had unlawfully wiretapped other government officials and other Americans.
Baker stated on day two:
Can I just — I’m turning to the Bureau to describe this. So his client was an individual named Dennis Montgomery, who I believe, to the best of my recollection, he said that he had been a U.S. Government contractor and, in the course of that work, had come across evidence of unlawful surveillance by the government of Americans — and including government officials — and wanted to give that information to the Bureau, which eventually did take place.
We had to actually dispatch FBI agents to go to a — from a field office to go collect this material. It was in the — to the best of my recollection, it was roughly in the late summer, fall of 2016 timeframe. [This date Baker provides is incorrect – it was actually late summer 2015].
Baker also stated, in response to questioning:
Mr. Sommers. And the surveillance, what time period was that?
Mr. Baker. I’m not entirely sure what the timeframe was. It was a significant — it was — one of the issues in the case was it was a large amount of data that he had that he wanted to provide, that these — these disks or other media had a lot of data on them about this, allegedly.
Mr. Sommers. Surveillance by whom?
Mr. Baker. By the U.S. Government itself of Americans, unlawfully.
Montgomery and his then-attorney Larry E. Klayman subsequently filed a federal lawsuit against FBI Director James Comey and the FBI for burying the 47 hard drives rather than pursuing an appropriate investigation of the Obama administration and specifically John Brennan and James Clapper, for their use of an illegal domestic surveillance system against the American people and Donald Trump.
In 2003, Comey told New York Magazine “I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now.”
NSA Whistleblowers J. Kirk Wiebe And William Binney, Former NSA Technical Director, Observed Nothing Questionable When Reviewing Montgomery’s Security Clearance Paperwork
In June 2019, Dr. Dave Janda interviewed NSA experts and whistleblowers William Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe to talk about CIA/NSA/FBI contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.
Kirk Wiebe stated:
I saw nothing questionable or anything that would indict what Montgomery said. Documents exist.
When you deny these platforms exist, then you deny what Brennan and Clapper are doing, then you bypass the U.S. Constitution.
These people will do anything in their power to silence someone. What kind of people do that?
Zullo Misled NSA Experts, Leaving Out Key Facts About Montgomery
NSA legends Kurt Weibe and Bill Binney confirmed to these reporters that their analysis of Dennis Montgomery would have been very different if Mike Zullo had told them the full set of facts regarding Whistleblower Montgomery and “THE HAMMER.”
On November 6, 2014, about three months after Zullo attended the initial meeting between Dennis Montgomery and Judge Lamberth, Mike Zullo delivered high-capacity external computer drives to NSA technical experts William Binney, Kirk Wiebe, and Thomas Drake for technical examination.
Mike Zullo did not tell the NSA experts that the hard drives he presented to them were not decrypted. The hard drives Zullo had in his possession were not the same hard drives that Montgomery would later decrypt and turn over to the FBI in August 2015.
Furthermore, according to Montgomery, Zullo knew that the hard drives he presented were encrypted, yet Zullo chose not to share that information with the NSA experts.
Zullo also neglected to tell the NSA experts about the meeting Montgomery had just had with onetime head of the FISA court Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington D.C. just three months earlier on August 2, 2014. That meeting alone would have most certainly placed Montgomery’s bona fides in an entirely different context than the characterization of Montgomery that Zullo had presented to the three NSA surveillance experts.
Zullo never mentioned that Judge Lamberth confirmed Montgomery’s security clearance as Mike Zullo sat in the meeting in Judge Lamberth’s chambers. Judge Lamberth not only confirmed Montgomery’s top-secret security clearance (TS/SCI) to work in SAP programs but commented on the high level of Montgomery’s TS/SCI top security clearance right in front of Mike Zullo. Zullo did not mention that either to the NSA experts.
Binney and Weibe later stated that Zullo never gave them the full picture about Montgomery.
Wiebe says that Zullo neglected to tell the three NSA experts-turned-whistleblowers that Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte had invoked the State Secrets Privilege (SSP) and a U.S. Protective Order (PO) against Montgomery — basically a government gag order invoked to protect national security secrets.
Zullo mischaracterized Montgomery’s background and withheld critical pieces of information that would have placed Dennis Montgomery and his national security career in an entirely different light for the NSA experts. How could a purportedly-trained detective ask NSA experts to evaluate a fellow whistleblower while withholding pertinent information? Based upon the egregiously incomplete information that Zullo had provided, Drake and Wiebe wrote a letter on November 13, 2014, summarizing their analysis of the data contained on the hard drives. The following day, Drake emailed the letter to Detective Brian Mackiewicz at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.
The letter, signed by Wiebe and Drake, states:
In summary, this letter certifies that to the best of Mr. Wiebe’s and Mr. Drake’s knowledge, none of the data examined reveals or otherwise supports the assertion the data contained on the hard drives examined resulted from the clandestine collection and processing of modern digital network communications and is instead, evidence of an outright and fraudulent con perpetrated on the government for personal gain and cover.
Drake went even further in his email to Mackiewicz, writing “we have found that he [Montgomery] is a complete and total FRAUD.” If Zullo had provided the three NSA experts with the full body of relevant information about Montgomery, Wiebe and Drake’s letter would have come to a different conclusion, to wit: Montgomery had a top-secret security clearance and was not a fraud.
But Zullo did not provide the experts with all of the pertinent information, begging the question — why?
Zullo now claims that he informed Binney and Wiebe about Montgomery’s State Secret’s Privilege during their first meeting and that the NSA experts must have forgotten.
Both Binney and Wiebe, however, disputed Zullo’s claim to these reporters, and insist that Zullo never told them about Montgomery’s State Secrets Privilege or his meeting with Judge Lamberth, or his top-secret security clearance, or that the document Montgomery presented contained classified information that Judge Lamberth recognized as having come before him at the FISA court.
Referring to the NSA experts who examined the hard drives, Zullo recently said via a published statement “so whether they forgot about it over time, I don’t know. But in any case it should have zero bearing on the examination of numerous hard drive evidence.”
Zullo’s insistence that knowledge about the existence of Montgomery’s State Secrets Privilege would not have affected the NSA experts’ analysis of Montgomery’s hard drives is obtuse at best.
The critical information Zullo withheld from Binney, Wiebe, and Drake would have altered their understanding and analysis of Montgomery’s data. Placing Montgomery and his classified work in context was key to an appropriate evaluation.
The information Zullo withheld would have telegraphed to Binney, Wiebe, and Drake that Montgomery dealt with highly-classified information, was privy to national security secrets, and could not provide them with any classified information under penalty of law.
Binney, Wiebe, and Drake would have understood that had Montgomery provided them with any classified information, Montgomery could have been charged under the Espionage Act with disclosing state secrets.
Montgomery had included canceled bank checks, partial banking passwords and other material that could only have been accessed through sophisticated surveillance technologies in order to signal to the whistleblowers that Montgomery had access to such technology.
Only later did Binney and Wiebe learn the full scope of information about Montgomery that Zullo withheld, including Montgomery’s top security clearance.
Zullo subsequently attempted to discredit Montgomery with the letter he sought and received from the NSA experts. That letter had been written based upon flagrantly inaccurate information, furthering the false narrative that Montgomery was a fraud.
Why would Mike Zullo want to paint Dennis Montgomery as a fraud?
Montgomery: I have not spoken to Zullo for years — since before I went to the FBI
Montgomery claims that he has not been in contact with Zullo for over five years.
Zullo had no involvement in negotiating Montgomery’s immunity deal with the DOJ and FBI.
Zullo was not involved in Montgomery’s handover of the 47 decrypted hard drives to the FBI in Miramar, Florida in August of 2015.
Zullo has stated that the 47 hard drives given to the FBI had nothing on them. Mike Zullo had no way of knowing what was on those 47 hard drives that Montgomery turned over to the FBI.
Zullo had no access to, or involvement in, Montgomery’s classified testimony in the FBI SCIF with Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis and FBI Special Agents Barnett and Giardina.
Zullo does not appear to understand that the 47 hard drives given to the FBI were not in any way the same hard drives that Montgomery had provided to Zullo. Montgomery gave 53 hard drives to the MCSO. Zullo held back six of those hard drives, according to Montgomery. The 53 hard drives given to Zullo were not decrypted and Zullo did not have the decryption key, states Dennis Montgomery.
Keep in mind, Montgomery knew that Zullo had illicitly recorded him and made what later became known as “The Whistleblower Tapes.” Montgomery knew of the illicitly-recorded “Whistleblower Tapes” before he gave his sworn testimony to the FBI. Who, knowing just that one piece of information, would have trusted Mike Zullo? Montgomery certainly did not.
Shipp of Fools Or Deep State Tools
Mike Zullo feeds incorrect information about Dennis Montgomery and “THE HAMMER” to self-described “CIA whistleblower” Kevin Shipp.
It appears that Zullo began working with Shipp earlier this year.
Shipp initially stated that “THE HAMMER” was a “hoax” and “didn’t exist.”
Shipp’s defamation and disinformation campaign against a (now deceased) US Navy Admiral and retired US Air Force Lt. General, legendary NSA whistleblowers, Dr. Dave Janda, and these reporters is nothing less than grotesque.
William Binney responded to Kevin Shipp’s email screed by writing “sorry you’ve really lost it Kevin.”
Shipp claiming “THE HAMMER” does not exist only protects Brennan, Clapper and the Deep State thugs who sought to turn America into a Soviet-style police state.
“They were executed in Miami as you remember they should have the agents signatures.”
Montgomery’s former attorney Klayman not only castigated Shipp and Zullo as “a******s” in an email to his former client but also attached images of two FBI receipts that documented Montgomery’s hand over 47 hard drives to the FBI.
The Key To The Coup Is “THE HAMMER,” Not The NSA And 702 Abuse
Those who suggest that the coup is about the NSA and 702 abuse are either simply wrong or involved in tactical deception.
“THE HAMMER” and the illegal surveillance that took place under John Brennan and James Clapper is the key to understanding the coup.
Dennis Montgomery was at Fort Washington, Maryland with John Brennan and James Clapper where they employed “THE HAMMER” to spy on all of America for “blackmail” and “leverage.” They utilized THE HAMMER to strong-arm anyone and everyone who got in their way as they turned America into a police state.
Montgomery, even after a stroke, decided to become a whistleblower. Montgomery stated, “this is my last stand for America.”
As those who attempt to divert attention away from “THE HAMMER” and try to characterize Montgomery as “a brilliant and elaborate con man” not only present incorrect and misleading “facts,” they also ensure that the CIA will continue to break the law and its charter as they continue using “THE HAMMER” in their war on America. and her people and her constitution,
Those who deny the weaponization of “THE HAMMER” against America ensure the illegal surveillance system will remain in place reverse engineering our constitutional rights to freedom.
Never before in our history has a President so disregarded the rule of law as did President Obama and his accomplices.
Obama and his cabal of communists picked and the laws they wanted to follow.” It was a free for all for his comrades.
Billions of dollars worth of intelligence went to China, Russia, and Iran. Our ports went to enemy combatants – even those on the Pentagon’s “Blacklist” who were wanted for “capture or kill.” America’s adversaries were awarded and embraced under the Obama administration. The Democrats political adversaries are now considered the enemy.
These powerful surveillance tools were entrusted to the intel agencies to protect America from enemies foreign and domestic, not to turn America into a Soviet-style police state.
Dennis Montgomery is the real whistleblower, who should be called to testify before Congress.
Our lives, our freedom, and our very destiny depend upon the exposure of “THE HAMMER.”
George Washington, Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, had Thomas Paine’s famous words from “The American Crisis” read to all his troops before crossing the Delaware River:
These are the times that try men’s souls; the summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
Montgomery Has Done Great Things For This Country — Why Are They Trying To Hide It?
Montgomery Invented Predator Drone Surveillance Technology That Protected U.S. Troops In Iraq And Was Referenced By The New York Times
At the onset of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003, U.S. military convoys in Iraq were suffering heavy casualties from roadside IEDs and ambushes.
The American Report has obtained what appears to be a 2003 email sent to Montgomery’s eTreppid business partner Warren Trepp.
The subject line of the email reads “You made the NY Times.”
The body of the email consists of excerpts from an October 3, 2003, New York Times article titled “THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ: COUNTERINSURGENCY; New Spy Gear Aims to Thwart Attacks in Iraq.”
The New York Times also confirmed Montgomery’s credibility in the 2003 article about U.S. military efforts to deploy surveillance technologies in theater in Iraq to save troops from ambushes and IED attacks:
The Air Force and the Army are working on a classified project to use new combinations of surveillance aircraft and other sensors, along with intelligence on the ground, to try to detect and counter the increasingly deadly ambushes against American forces in Iraq, senior Pentagon officials said on Wednesday.
The surveillance effort could include a range of tactics and technology, the officials said, including equipping remotely piloted Predator aircraft with special radar or sensors to help find homemade bombs or suspected guerrilla activity.
Despite the best efforts of to paint Dennis Montgomery as a fraud and his technology as a hoax, federal court records, government copyright records, government agency coins, and letters of commendation from high-level military sources, praising Montgomery as an American hero, strongly suggest otherwise.
The FBI tried to frame Montgomery with a false dossier when they were threatened with prison by Judge Cooke after they had proffered fraudulent documents.
Montgomery continues to hold a Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) security clearance, Montgomery says.
U.S. National Security Personnel Recognized Dennis Montgomery’s Contributions To National Defense
Senior officials from inside the U.S. national security and intelligence communities presented Montgomery with government agency coins in signs of recognition of Montgomery’s technical contributions to America’s national defense, says Montgomery.
The coins, called “challenge coins,” are coveted awards that acknowledge the unique accomplishments of colleagues. Though certain coins can be located on the internet, the authentic coins feature unique etchings on the side of the coin that are difficult or impossible to duplicate.
U.S. Navy Captain James G. Roche (Ret.), who was the Secretary of the Air Force, tasked Captain Robert P. Lyons with working with Dennis Montgomery.
Secretary Roche presented Montgomery with a commemorative Secretary of the Air Force coin inscribed with Roche’s name, Montgomery added.
Big Safari is the U.S. Air Force program Captain Lyons had been working on. The Big Safari program is dedicated to key operational capabilities for the U.S. Air Force.
Big Safari is “a secretive Air Force acquisition program for specialized special mission aircraft” and “is not known for being very public,” according to the U.S. Air Force.
Captain Lyons worked with Dennis Montgomery, and views Montgomery in high esteem, considering Montgomery a “hero” who Captain Lyons “deeply enjoyed knowing and working with.”
Montgomery “helped the Nation to be better against our foes,” Captain Lyons believed. Captain Lyons returned a U.S. flag to American soil that was dedicated to Dennis Montgomery and Montgomery’s family, in recognition of his service to the Nation.
Captain Lyons, unlike others, was in a position to know what was, in fact, happening in regards to national security because Captain Lyons was read into the programs he was working on, conjointly, with Dennis Montgomery. Montgomery still holds a TS/SCI security clearance with access to Special Access Programs (SAP), Montgomery states.
Captain Lyons played a key role in the building of the foreign surveillance tool known as “THE HAMMER,” Montgomery says.
Inventor Montgomery Holds Patents, Software Copyrights, And Took His Own Company Public On NASDAQ
A quick search at the U.S. Patent Office and Google Patents websites would show that Dennis L. Montgomery is listed as the inventor of numerous patents that were assigned to eTreppid Technologies. Montgomery was a partner, CTO and executive vice president at eTreppid . These patents encompass Montgomery’s inventions in the technology disciplines of video surveillance, video compression, encryption, and other cutting edge technologies that are critical to U.S. national security.
An online query at the U.S. Copyright Office indicates that Montgomery holds multiple copyrights for computer software code for the medical, medical laboratory, and clinical fields.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings show that Montgomery was a major shareholder and technology officer of a company that went public in an IPO on the NASDAQ Small Cap exchange.
Trump Vindicated, “THE HAMMER” Remains
Montgomery eventually went to become a contractor for the U.S. government.
President Trump, it was found in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, was not colluding with the Russians and was not guilty of obstruction of justice.
Still, the Democrats and the Deep State are frothing at the bit to remove President Trump from office.
The Mockingbird Media’s smear machine continues to work overtime in an effort to ensure that President Trump, if not impeached, is not reelected in 2020.
The Mockingbird Media does so not only to remove President Trump from office, but also to ensure the many subversive crimes committed under the Obama administration — most particularly the misuse of “The Hammer” – remain buried.
America’s final chapter has yet to be written. Benjamin Franklin warned we had a “Republic — if we could keep it.”
COPYRIGHT 2019 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES