11 Days Before President Trump’s Inauguration, Holdren Advised U.S. Government To Lift Gain-Of-Function Research Ban
By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | The American Report | June 16, 2021
John P. Holdren, President Barack Obama’s and Vice President Joseph Biden’s White House, Science Czar, co-authored a 1977 book that shockingly claimed that an accidental leak from a biological warfare laboratory was a potential manmade “‘solution’ to the [human] population explosion” and called for a ‘Planetary Regime’ to enforce human population limits.
John P. Holdren, Director of the Obama-Biden White House Office Of Science and Technology, Vice President Joseph Biden, and President Barack Obama
Holdren is a lifelong proponent of cold, antihuman measures by which governments, global intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations, and ultimately a ‘Planetary Regime,’ can leverage science and technology to achieve massive human depopulation objectives.
When Holdren advised the U.S. government to lift its 2014 ban on lethal gain-of-function research, he clearly understood that a leak of a genetically-enhanced viral pathogen from a biological warfare laboratory such as China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology could unleash a global pandemic capable of killing millions of people around the world, including hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Even more sinister than Obama, Biden, and Holdren greenlighting an official recommendation to lift the U.S. government ban on gain-of-function research was the timing of that recommendation: just 11 days before Donald Trump was sworn-in as the 45th President of the United States.
Shocking Excerpts From Ecoscience, The 1977 Book, Co-authored By Obama-Biden White House Science Advisor John P. Holdren
According to the 1977 book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, co-authored by the Obama-Biden White House Science Czar John P. Holdren:
As if the threat of a natural pandemic were not gruesome enough, there is always the threat of biological warfare or of an accidental escape of lethal agents from a biological warfare laboratory or, conceivably, from a laboratory engaged in genetic engineering experiments (see material on recombinant DNA research in Chapter 14). Although most laypeople have long been afraid of thermonuclear war, they are just beginning to grasp the colossal hazard posed by chemical and biological warfare (CBW). Any country with one or two well-trained microbiologists and even a modest budget can build its own biological doomsday weapons. Constructing lethal viruses against which there is little or no resistance in human populations can easily be done in theory; it may already have been done in practice. There were at one time rumors of the development by the American CBW establishment of a pneumonic rabies, one that, instead of being transmitted by bite, is transmitted in the same way as the common cold: from person to person via exhaled droplets. This is certainly possible, since under special conditions (such as those that sometimes occur in caves full of rabid rats) rabies appears to have been transmitted through the air. Such a disease would be a disastrously effective weapon if it were transmitted by infected individuals before symptoms appear, since once they do appear, rabies is (with one notable recent exception) 100 percent fatal.
Their deaths were caused by just one group of viruses…
…Fatal accidents occur in laboratories where work is done on other kinds of viruses, as well as other microorganisms…
…Biological warfare laboratories are potential sources of a man made “solution” to the population explosion. It is essential that some way be found to block all further work on biological weapons -the risk for humanity is simply too great.
Another excerpt from Holdren’s Ecoscience discusses the role of a ‘Planetary Regime’ to enforce population controls:
The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible…
…Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime — sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs [Developed Countries] to LDCs [Less Developed Countries], and including all food on the international market.
The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea and other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions.
COPYRIGHT 2021 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES