Home Blog Page 3

Evidence Indicating COVID-19 Is A Designed Bioweapon With A Toxic Structure That Bay Be Replicated In Vaccines

0
SARS-COV - POLYBASIC CLEAVAGE SITE - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Lawrence Sellin | December 3, 2021

A previous article at The American Report identified two “smoking guns” supporting the conclusion that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory.

First, a de facto scientific recipe for the laboratory creation of COVID-19 was described in the 2018 research grant application to the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) submitted by scientists who directly collaborated with the “bat woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The research proposal explicitly states that bat coronaviruses, collected in southern China by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, would be isolated and genetically sequenced, particularly the spike proteins, which are the binding elements initiating infection.

It was further proposed that spike proteins demonstrating “high risk” for human infection would be artificially combined with other bat coronavirus “backbones,” creating entirely new and potentially dangerous coronaviruses.

The second smoking gun in the DARPA grant application was the artificial insertion of furin polybasic cleavage sites, short sequences of amino acids e.g. proline-arginine-arginine-alanine or PRRA, long-known to increase infectivity and lethality of coronaviruses.

COVID POLYBASIC CLEAVAGE SITE

The enzyme furin is ubiquitous in the human body, found in multiple organ systems including lungs, heart, kidneys, brain and blood vessels.

The PRRA sequence found in COVID-19, does not exist in any of hundreds of close bat coronaviruses relatives from which COVID-19 could have evolved.

The 2018 DARPA research application proposed to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites, like PRRA, into low-risk bat coronaviruses and then testing the ability of those laboratory-created viruses to infect human cells.

That application was ultimately rejected by DARPA because it involved dangerous “gain of function” experiments creating new human-infecting viruses, which also have the potential for dual use as bioweapons.

It is important to note that the section of the COVID-19 genetic code (CGG-CGG) that produces the “RR” segment of the PRRA sequence is extremely rare.

The two tandem CGG codons do not appear anywhere else in the COVID-19 genetic code, nor does it exist in that context in any close bat coronavirus relative of COVID-19.

Thus, CGG-CGG is a unique marker both as an indicator of its laboratory origin and its potential role as a designed feature of the disease process.

According to a 2020 scientific article, the COVID-19 furin polybasic cleavage site (PRRA) and its surrounding structures may be far more toxic than first realized.

The approximately 20 amino acids surrounding COVID-19’s furin polybasic cleavage site possess sequence and structural elements comparable to those of Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB).

SEB acts as a “superantigen” and immune system activator stimulating the release large amounts of cytokines, often called “cytokine storm” and capable of producing multi-organ hyperinflammation similar to toxic shock syndrome.

The authors also state that COVID-19 mutations strengthen its “superantigen” character.

As a confirmation of those observations, the same authors demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies directed against Staphylococcal enterotoxin B “superantigen” inhibit the entry of the COVID-19 virus into cultured cells.

It may be no accident that China’s People’s Liberation Army’s Third Military Medical University has done extensive research on SEB and “superantigens,” because that center has been implicated in the creation of COVID-19 and is associated with the recent monoclonal antibody “cure” announced for COVID-19.

Caution, therefore, is warranted regarding mandating COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which initiate the synthesis of spike protein inside the human body and may replicate the toxic structures introduced into COVID-19, potentially becoming a causative factor in organ inflammation.

A scientific abstract published on November 8, 2021 concludes that the mRNA vaccines:

dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

Finally, it may be purely coincidental that Moderna, a biotechnology company that produces a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, holds a patent (US 10,501,513 B2), filed on February 7, 2017, describing “protein cleavage” sites and including a complementary genetic sequence matching that for the furin polybasic cleavage site found in COVID-19.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

Smoking Guns, Designed Mutations, And The U.S. Government Cover-up Of The Laboratory Origin Of COVID-19

0
COVID-19 - ANTHONY FAUCI - PETER DASZAK - THE AMERICAN REPORT - 1280

By Lawrence Sellin | December 2, 2021

If you are wondering why U.S. intelligence agencies are incapable of identifying the origin of COVID-19 and why the U.S. government shows no interest in pursuing that issue, wonder no more.

There is a deliberate cover-up underway because the rich and powerful multi-national interests that control the U.S. government are massively invested in China’s economic success and many U.S officials and scientists could be accused of complicity in the creation of COVID-19.

The scientific recipe for the laboratory creation of COVID-19 was described in the 2018 research grant application to the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) “Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses” submitted by Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance and his primary co-applicants Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina and Linfa Wang of Duke University-National University of Singapore, a Chinese scientist who also worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In the same year, all the applicants participated in The 8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases in Wuhan, China, October 21-22, 2018.

The application was ultimately rejected by DARPA because it involved dangerous “gain of function” experiments creating new human-infecting viruses and the potential for dual use as a bioweapon.

DARPA, however, left the door open for partial funding and it is very likely that experiments were already ongoing in the laboratories of the principal investigators at the time the application was submitted.

The research proposal explicitly states that bat coronavirus samples, collected in southern China by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, would be isolated and genetically sequenced in Wuhan, in particular, the spike proteins, which is the binding element initiating infection.

In follow-up experiments conducted by Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Linfa Wang of Duke University-National University of Singapore, spike proteins demonstrating “high risk” for human infection would be artificially combined with other bat coronavirus “backbones,” creating entirely new and potentially dangerous coronaviruses, which would then be tested for human infection by Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina.

Another “smoking gun” for the laboratory origin of COVID-19 is the presence of the furin polybasic cleavage site in the virus (PRRA).

COVID POLYBASIC CLEAVAGE SITE

It is a four amino acid sequence, which does not exist in any of hundreds of close bat coronaviruses relatives from which COVID-19 could have evolved.

The enzyme furin is ubiquitous in the human body and it has long been known that the presence of furin polybasic cleavage sites in viruses facilitates viral entry and replication in human cells, thereby increasing transmissibility and pathogenicity.

The presence of the furin polybasic cleavage site can also help explain why the COVID-19 virus can attack multiple human organ systems.

Chinese People’s Liberation Army scientists, Shibo Jiang and Shuwen Liu, demonstrated the artificial insertion of furin cleavage sites in 2013.

As stated in a May 18, 2021 Gateway Pundit article, the artificial insertion of the furin polybasic cleavage site into a bat coronavirus backbone was likely done under the supervision of Shibo Jiang in coordination with his military-trained colleague Shuwen Liu and others at the School of Pharmaceutical Science, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Again, the 2018 DEFUSE research grant application explicitly states the applicants’ intention to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites into high abundance, but low risk bat coronaviruses found in China and testing the ability of those laboratory-created viruses to infect human cells:

We will analyze all SARS-CoV gene sequences for appropriately conserved proteolytic cleavage sites in S2 and for the presence of potential furin cleavage sites. SARSr-CoV S with mismatches in proteolytic cleavage sites can be activated by exogenous trypsin or cathepsin L. Where clear mismatches occur, we will introduce appropriate human specific cleavage sites and evaluate growth potential in Vero cells and HAE cultures. In SARS-CoV, we will ablate several of these sites based on pseudotyped particle studies and evaluate the impact of select SARSr-CoV S changes on virus replication and pathogenesis. We will also review deep sequence data for low abundant high risk SARSr-CoV that encode functional proteolytic cleavage sites, and if so, introduce these changes into the appropriate high abundant, low risk parental strain.

It is important to note that the furin polybasic cleavage site inserted in the COVID-19 virus may have been designed to mutate into a more contagious and pathogenic variants, like the presently dominant Delta variant.

The initial proline (P), having an unusually rigid structure, first mutated in March 2021 to histidine (H) as the UK variant.

In July 2021, the proline mutated in the Delta variant to an arginine (R) residue, from PRRA to RRRA. Arginine is a chemically basic amino acid, which provides the functional elements in furin polybasic cleavage sites. That is, multiple arginines in sequence make the furin polybasic cleavage site more potent.

The new, reportedly highly contagious Omicron variant from South Africa, among other mutations, has a proline to histidine mutation in the furin polybasic cleavage site.

Unless the true origin of COVID-19 is rapidly addressed, the world not only faces the possibility of another man-made pandemic, but the complete destruction of science as an honest and objective discipline

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

 

From SDS To Soros To MSNBC: Maya Wiley, Her Soros-Connected Lawyer Husband, Her Radical Parents, And The Communist Campaign To Destroy Kyle Rittenhouse

0
MSNBC - WILEY - SOROS - CLOWARD AND PIVEN - ACORN - SDS - RITTENHOUSE - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | The American Report | November 23, 2021

“…the Department of Homeland Security has said white supremacy is a significant danger to this country, and not ANTIFA … And I do feel like we are in more danger today than we were yesterday” — radical MSNBC Legal Analyst Maya Wiley, daughter of Cloward and Piven activist George Wiley, reacting to Kyle Rittenhouse trial jury verdict of not guilty on all counts

MSNBC Legal Analyst Maya Wiley, who provided the far-left news network with on-air analysis of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and advocated for the conviction and imprisonment of Rittenhouse, worked for George Soros’s Open Society Foundation and chaired the Soros-funded Tides Network Board.

GEORGE SOROS - MAYA WILEY - THE AMERICAN REPORT

Maya Wiley is married to Harlan Mandel. Like his wife Maya, the MSNBC legal analyst, Harlan Mandel also held a senior-level position working for George Soros. Harlan Mandel is the former Deputy General Counsel of the Open Society Institute / Soros Foundations Network.

Maya Wiley’s husband Harlan Mandel, George Soros, Maya Wiley

Maya Wiley’s mother is the late Wretha Frances Whittle, a former member of the communist revolutionary youth group Students for a Democratic Society (SDS).

Domestic terror organization the Weather Underground was a violent militant faction of SDS. The Weather Underground carried out a domestic terrorism bombing campaign in the United States, targeting the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. Domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, a longtime associate of Barack Obama, is one of the most notorious Weather Underground terrorists.

Martha Wiley’s father is the late George Wiley, a 1960s black militant revolutionary who founded the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). George Wiley is revered among left-wing revolutionaries as the father of the “welfare rights” movement.

Whittle met George Wiley while she was a graduate student. 

George Wiley was a protege of notorious communist revolutionary theorists and strategists Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven. Cloward and Piven, from their prestigious positions as married Columbia University professors, developed the anti-American ‘Cloward and Piven Strategy.’

The ‘Cloward and Piven Strategy’ advocates expanding welfare benefits in the United States while simultaneously flooding government welfare system rolls with new beneficiaries. The ultimate objective of the Cloward and Piven Strategy is to overwhelm and then collapse the entire United States welfare system in order to usher in socialism and communism as an economic system to replace American capitalism. 

The origins of the Cloward and Piven Strategy can be traced back to an article written by Cloward and Piven titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” and published in the May 1966 edition of the far-left progressive magazine The Nation.

In a video interview posted in 2016 at the George Wiley Center YouTube Channel, Francis Fox Piven boasts:

Now, I learned about welfare through my work in what was, I think, the first poverty program in the United States, Mobilization for Youth. And it was through that work that Richard and I, Richard Cloward and I, developed a kind of strategy to topple that welfare system.

The key takeaway is that the broad campaign by Democrats and the far-left legacy media to destroy Kyle Rittenhouse, and along with him the Second Amendment and the right to self defense, traces directly back to subversive communist organizations.

The right of Americans to self defense is well established under United States law. The right to bear arms is enumerated in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Self defense is a critical right amidst widespread violent and deadly riots carried out by communist revolutionaries, including ANTIFA.

Ponder this question: At the end of the day, is there really much difference between the violent communist revolutionaries who took over the streets of Kenosha, Wisconsin in 2020 and nearly burned down that city and George Wiley’s 1960s band of violent communist revolutionaries who terrorized social workers and local governments in a ruthless effort to carry out Cloward and Piven’s wealth redistribution strategy and collapse the entire U.S. economy into communism?

And are either of those two Marxist operations any different from what the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917 and what Mao did in China in 1949?

MSNBC’s Maya Wiley and her “former” boss, comrade George Soros, understand full well what Kyle Rittenhouse represents: a direct threat to the violent communist revolution in the streets of America that was carried out in the 1960s by groups like SDS and its domestic terror wing known as the Weather Underground. A street-level violent communist revolution that continues today at the hands of militant groups such as ANTIFA in large cities like New York, in medium size cities like Minneapolis, and in small cities like Kenosha. 

George Wiley, Cloward and Piven, domestic terrorists Bill Ayers, Ayers’ friend from the neighborhood Barack Obama, and, it would also appear, MSNBC’s Maya Wiley, all share a common ideological heritage of revolutionary communism. They are all in for Barack Hussein Obama’s transformation of America. 

The far-left media’s attempts to destroy the victimized Kyle Rittenhouse, the Second Amendment, and the right of self-defense, originates in the doctrines of American communist organizations. These communists would like nothing better than to disarm Americans in order to steal their country.

The life story of MSNBC’s Maya Wiley and her radical family is an informative and revealing case study, which in her particular situation, tracks directly back to George Soros and the communist precepts of the Weather Underground-connected SDS, Cloward and Piven, and ACORN.

MSNBC is the same network that was caught outrageously directing one of its freelancers to follow the jury van in Kenosha, Wisconsin in an unlawful act of jury intimidation, prompting Judge Bruce Schroeder to ban MSNBC from the Kenosha County Courthouse.

In a mysterious twist to Maya Wiley’s life story, George Wiley is presumed to have drowned at age 42 in Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay in 1973 after falling overboard from a boat that Maya and her older brother were aboard. Wiley’s body was found along Chesapeake Beach following a three-day search.

Maya Wiley continued to carry her on her radical family’s communist torch by hiring Ana Maria Reichenbach as her research assistant. Fight Back News referred to Ana Maria Reichenbach as “a member of the University of North Carolina Students for a Democratic Society.” 

David Gilbert was a founding member of the SDS chapter at Columbia University, the same University where George Wiley’s mentors Cloward and Piven were professors. Gilbert was a getaway driver for the 1981 Brinks Armored Car Robbery in Nanuet, New York, perpetrated by members of the Weather Underground, the Black Liberation Army, and the May 19th Communist Organization. 

David Gilbert and former SDS member Katherine Boudin are the parents of radical San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin. Weather Underground leaders and communist revolutionaries Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dhorn adopted Chesa Boudin, becoming his legal guardians.

Maya Wiley’s Statements On Twitter And MSNBC About Kyle Rittenhouse:

Appearing on MSNBC’s The Sunday Show with Jonathan Capehart on Sunday, November 14, 2021, Maya Wiley stated:

The larger context here: Jacob Blake. The reason there was all that activity that resulted in Kyle Rittenhouse showing up with his AR-15, violating Wisconsin law, violating a curfew, was because Jacob Blake was killed by a police officer and his uncle, who is also named Jacob Blake, has been in that courtroom, outside the courthouse, every single day, hoping for justice for somebody, and in this case, it’s the victims of Kyle Rittenhouse.

Appearing alongside Shaquille Brewster and Reverend Al Sharpton on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House” with Nicolle Wallace on November 19, 2021 immediately following a Kenosha, Wisconsin jury’s acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse on all five counts, Maya Wiley stated:

Yeah, I don’t think there’s much question that obviously the jury bought the self defense claim. This was one that included witnesses, in addition to what Shaq said, that said, for instance, Mr. [Richie] McGinnis from the Daily Caller, who said “Mr. Rosenbaum lunged for the rifle” as Rittenhouse testified. And you have the medical examiner that the prosecution put on who said “Yeah, it could have been. It’s possible that there was a lunge.”

Those are the kind of things that helps the defense create reasonable doubt.

But, I do want to say, at the end of the day, I really think this turned on the judge. Because we have a judge that in addition, it’s not just that he said “you can’t call the people who have been killed or injured ‘victims,’ it’s that he allowed demonstrators to be labeled as rioters and, at even one instance, Drew Hernandez, who is ideological and has a very formed biased opinion, who gets to be on the stand as a fact witness and use the word ‘Antifa,’ even when the Department of Homeland Security has said white supremacy is a significant danger to this country, and not ANTIFA. 

“…the Department of Homeland Security has said white supremacy is a significant danger to this country, and not ANTIFA … And I do feel like we are in more danger today than we were yesterday.” — Maya Wiley On MSNBC Following Rittenhouse Verdict 

So, what that tells us, though, is the inability of the prosecution to actually cross examine on the bias of that witness. 

And then throwing out the misdemeanor gun charge?  Really? He threw it out. Reading the statutes, not clear to me how that stands. But what it says to the jury, essentially the jury knows there was an illegal weapons charge and they know the judge took it away. 

These are very clear signals to a jury what the judge thinks about the case. And we have so many examples in this and that is a deep problem for the belief that the justice system works.  And I do feel like we are in more danger today than we were yesterday. 

Well, I think one of the things that this trial has shown, many people who had the opportunity to see inside a courtroom is what black people in this country have been experiencing for hundreds of years, which is a system that doesn’t necessarily work fairly for everyone. Because people are people. They have biases and they bring them into the courtroom. 

And so, while the system sometimes works, I don’t want to say it never works. But in this case, it’s very hard to look at this and say it did.

Reverend Sharpton reacted to Maya Wiley’s comments by stating:

When you look at the broad message that came out of this, they have said now that vigilanties can go to protests and kill people and say that they were defending themselves, which puts all Americans, particularly those who want to protest for whatever issue, in danger. The precedent that it set, that you can have a judge sit there and say “people can be killed, but you can’t call them victims, but you can call the other side what you want, that I can let a tumbler sit in front of a man charged with murder and let him choose his own jury. So I think that many of us are far more concerned about what the broad message this verdict gives than arguing what the legal experts ought to argue, and rightfully so, about the particulars of the case…it took a tremendous blow, this verdict. 

MSNBC Legal Analyst Maya Wiley’s New York City Mayoral Campaign Was Funded By George Soros 

Maya Wiley received half a million dollars in SuperPac funding for her New York City mayoral campaign from the Service Employees International Union and a matching half a million dollars from George Soros through “the independent expenditure group 1199 for Maya, a joint venture with 1199SEIU,” according to the New York Post. 

“[Maya] Wiley’s ties to Soros date back to the late 1990s, when she worked for nearly two years for the Open Society Foundations, according to her LinkedIn profile,” the New York Post reported on June 13, 2021.

Maya Wiley also worked as Chair of the Tides Network Board from 2010 to 2012, according to her LinkedIn profile.  “2016-2018, #Soros foundations awarded $19,856,195 to Tides Network,” Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, tweeted on September 22, 2020.

Maya Wiley also worked as counsel to New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio. De Blasio visited the communist U.S.S.R. while in college.

Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF): The Soros-funded NGO Led By CEO Harlen Mandel, Maya Wiley’s Husband

Maya Wiley’s husband Harlen Mandel is CEO of Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF), a Brooklyn-based NGO supported by George Soros.

MDIF was launched in 1995 with $500,000 in startup money from George Soros as a “Media Bank” or “Media Development Loan Fund” and operated by its co-founders, Serbian journalist Saša Vučinić and former Washington Post reporter Stuart C. Auerbach.

Harlen Mandel “served from 1996 to 1998 as Deputy General Counsel of the Open Society Institute/Soros Foundations Network,” according to Mandel’s official biography posted at MDIF’s website. 

The Washington Post’s Stuart Aueberach “married [Carl] Bernstein’s first wife after they divorced,” according to The Washingtonian. Bernstein’s first wife was Carol Honsa.

We previously reported at the American Report in a 2018 article titled “Shady Watergate Reporters Target Trump; FBI Surveilled Bernstein’s Communist Parents For 35 Years; Tied To Rosenberg-Sobell Soviet Atomic Spies; Blumenthal: Woodward Is An “FBI Asset”:

Bernstein’s parents were deeply connected to the Soviet spies who stole America’s nuclear secrets and other critical classified military intelligence:  Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and Morton Sobell.

Carl Bernstein grew up in a nest of communism…

…Every fall the Bernstein family commemorated the Bolshevik revolution —  “the anniversary of the Russian Revolution — October Division.” The Bernsteins’ religion was, as prescribed by collectivist regimes everywhere, communism. 

The Media Development Investment Fund announced on March 19, 2018:

Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF) today announced final close of MDIF Media Finance I, a $6-million impact fund investing in independent news media in select emerging and frontier markets…

…MMF I investors include the Open Society Foundations (Soros Economic Development Fund).

George Soros, Lord Malloch-Brown, And Election Technology Company Smartmatic

United Nations-linked British “voting expert” Lord Mark Malloch-Brown became the President of the Open Society Foundation on January 1, 2021, after having served since 2014 as the chairman of the board of directors of election technology company Smartmatic. “The chairman of SmartMatics and the SGO Group, Mark Malloch-Brown, serves on the Open Society Foundations Global Board — founded by George Soros,” the Associated Press admitted. 

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown was “a member of the Soros Advisory Committee on Bosnia from 1993 to 1994,” according to Malloch-Brown’s official UN biography.

A Deeper Look Into George Wiley’s Connection To ACORN

Fox News reported in a September 15, 2009 article titled “ACORN: A Brief History”:

Originally named the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now, ACORN was founded as a nonprofit, nonpartisan entity in 1970 by Wade Rathke, a follower of George Wiley, founder of the National Welfare Rights Organization. Rathke stepped down from his post as chief organizer in 2008 after it was revealed that his brother Dale had embezzled nearly $1 million of ACORN funds eight years earlier.

Although George Wiley’s National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) went bankrupt in 1975, a successor organization, The National Welfare Rights Union (NWRU), which has been described as a reincarnation of Wiley’s NWRO, was formed in 1987 and continues to operate today.

The National Welfare Rights Union (NWRU), like the NWRO before it, demands a guaranteed annual income for all Americans. The NWRU also demands single payer healthcare, free nationalized childcare, free education from birth to death, nationalization of all utilities including electricity, heating, communications (phone), internet, and housing — basically a communist utopia. Many of these objectives are being implemented by Senator Bernie Sanders and the radical squad of AOC and her comrades, working closely with the Biden Administration.

According to NWRU’s official website, “On August 31, 2008, NWRU published its “Eight Position Points to Dismantle Poverty in the U.S.,” which included the following:

  1. A Guaranteed Annual Income: “All residents of the U.S. will be eligible for a guaranteed annual income to protect them from falling below the poverty level.
  2. Universal Health Care with a Single-Payee: “All residents will be eligible for a single-payee health care system funded by the federal government. We oppose private insurance that profits off of the medical conditions of low-income, uninsured people.”
  3. Nationalization of Child Care: “All children should be eligible for free, quality child care. We also support a living wage for child care providers.”
  4. Nationalization of Education, Including the Headstart Program: “All residents will be entitled to education from birth to death. The Headstart Program must be preserved, funding must be increased, and eligibility should be expanded.”
  5. Nationalization of Utilities: “All utilities including electricity, natural gas, heating fuels, water, alternative energy, and communications should be properties of the public domain and not subject to privatization. All forms of communication, such as telephones and Internet access, should be included.”
  6. Nationalization of Housing: “Everyone has a right to a home. It is the duty of the government to provide affordable housing for all residents, and [to] provide periodic maintenance and upgrades.”
  7. Nationalization of Public Mass Transit: “All forms of mass, rapid transit should be fully accessible (including to those with physical disabilities) and affordable to all residents in communities across the country.”
  8. Troop Withdrawal from Iraq, Afghanistan, and No New Deployments: “The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have depleted the American economy with no end in sight. Poor people have disproportionately suffered from the last eight years of these costly deployments physically, emotionally, and financially.”

The National Welfare Rights Union (NWRU)’s official website states “Some people have commented about the relationship between the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). Many social commentators on the Internet have correctly identified the former George Wiley as an instrumental organizer in the origin of both groups.” 

In a 2007 post titled “George Wiley Award,” Wade Rathke, in his blogThe Chief Organizer Blog, wrote:

New Orleans     I was invited to the lunch held by the ACORN Caucus of Color on the final day of the Year End / Year Begin Meeting. Having arrived on time, I sat at the back table. As the organizers arrived there were a lot of double takes as they saw me there. When we went around and introduced ourselves, I said I was there for the red haired people.

But I was really there because Bertha Lewis, New York ACORN’s Executive Director, who was the outgoing caucus chair, and Steve Bradberry, Louisiana ACORN’s Head Organizer, needed me to explain who George Wiley was so that the Caucus members could fully appreciate the weight of the award. I was honored.

I told them that Dr. George Wiley was a professor of chemistry at Syracuse University and a native of Providence, Rhode Island. He had left the academy to be the deputy director of CORE, the Congress of Racial Equality, during the civil rights movement. As the movement progressed in the early to mid-60’s George left to figure out a way to go forward that he felt both important and compatible. He spent time at the Poverty Rights Action Center reaching out and talking to people. Welfare recipients were looking to unite from one pocket to another where they were isolated around the country. George pulled them together in a march on June 30th, 1966, to protest cutbacks in Columbus, Ohio. This became the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). By the time I worked for welfare rights and built the chapters in Springfield, Massachusetts in 1969, NWRO was the largest poor peoples’ organization in the country. I left in mid-1970 to found ACORN with his support as part of the NWRO “southern strategy” to force welfare reform by building a base to challenge Louisiana Senator Russell Long, head of the Senate Finance Committee, and Congressman Wilbur Mills from Arkansas, head of the all-powerful House Ways and Means Committee. Both were blocking welfare reform.

I told them about George’s visit to Arkansas to see ACORN in 1973 as he tried to figure out his next organization.

MSNBC helped lead the far-left media’s assault on Kyle Rittenhouse. The radical origins of MSNBC Legal Analyst Maya Wiley help explain MSNBC’s Marxist ideology that was on full display during the network’s extensive coverage of the Rittenhouse trial.

COPYRIGHT 2021 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES

 

 

Political Insurgency Against An Unconstitutional And Illegitimate Federal Government

0
COLONEL LAWRENCE SELLIN - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Lawrence Sellin  November 18, 2021

Legitimacy is the prerequisite for all governance not based on fear and coercion.

According to U.S. military Joint Publication 3-24:

“Legitimacy is a significant indicator of the extent to which systems of authority, decisions, and conduct are accepted by the local population. Political legitimacy of a government determines the degree to which the population will voluntarily comply with the decisions and rules issued by a governing authority. Governments described as legitimate primarily rule through the consent of the governed; those described as illegitimate tend to rely heavily on coercion. Citizens obey illegitimate governments because they fear retribution, rather than because they voluntarily accept its rule.”

Acquiescence or propaganda-driven artificial “popular support” should not be confused with legitimacy, the former evaporating when the immediate physical and economic security or the future prospects of the citizenry are threatened.

Unlike disagreements with policy commonplace in democracies, questions of legitimacy undermine a government’s raison d’etre or reason to exist.

A government that is inherently illegitimate through a fraudulent election or creates illegitimacy by mandating unconstitutional policies detrimental to its citizens, or both, creates the conditions for a bottom-up political insurgency.

The incubator of political insurgency is an ungoverned area or a locally governed area, where the federal government is unable or unwilling to extend control, effectively govern, or influence the local population.

In those cases, a political insurgency can take root when local governance is considered more legitimate because federal policies diverge significantly from local values and cultural norms.

A political insurgency will grow as it replaces the federal government’s responsibilities to provide proper security, public services, quality of life, education and justice.

Primary among those is protection against both criminal elements and illegal federal government intrusion furnished by local law enforcement and a fully-armed, trained and deputized citizenry.

Once autonomous local security is established, a political insurgency would pursue the objectives of reform and nullification of unconstitutional federal government mandates or intrusions.

The reform component of political insurgency seeks to compel the federal government to alter or discontinue its destructive policies through local civil disobedience and non-compliance.

Nullification involves a broader roll back of federal governmental authority in a geographically defined area creating greater regional autonomy.

A political insurgency does not expand from a single center of gravity, but through a coalescence of multiple “ink spots” of resistance.

The goal being that each political insurgency “ink spot” would establish itself based on local conditions and personnel and then connect to other “ink spots” creating a resistance network and a foundation for a “shadow government” based on restoring the American constitutional republic.

Initiation of a political insurgency would send the unmistakable message that a significant portion of the population no longer views the federal government as legitimate or contributing to the well-being of its citizens.

Regaining that legitimacy will require a strict interpretation of the Constitution, anticorruption efforts, true representative government and equal justice under law, measures which now only a nationwide political insurgency can set in motion.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Emory University Trains, Funds, And Collaborates With Chinese Military Scientists Linked To Biowarfare Research

0
EMORY UNIVERSITY - CHINA - CCP - PLA - BIOWARFARE - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Lawrence Sellin | November 16, 2021

Chinglai Yang and Ling Ye are faculty members in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

Chinglai Yang received his undergraduate degree from the University of Science and Technology of China, an institution under the direct control of the Chinese Communist Party via the Chinese Academy of Science and dedicated to improving China’s economy and defense infrastructure.

In 1996, Chinglai Yang completed a doctoral degree in biochemistry and molecular genetics at the University of Alabama.

Ling Ye is a graduate of Shanxi Medical University and received her M.D. and Ph.D. degrees from the Fourth Military Medical University in Xi’an, China (now the Air Force Military Medical University).

Both have received millions of dollars in research funding from Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Both have also maintained extensive links with the Chinese military.

Having established an anchor at Emory University with the hiring of Ling Ye, the Chinese military expanded its presence surreptitiously via a 2007 agreement between the newly-established, Fauci-funded Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance and China’s Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, a project led by Chinglai Yang.

The Emory-Harbin project provided a backdoor through which China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could access U.S. knowledge, skills, technologies and funding to be fed back into the PLA’s own influenza research program.

By that time, the PLA had a massive influenza research program of which the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute was a part.

In fact, the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute has been a critical component of China’s biowarfare program because it is the site of China’s second high containment biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) laboratory, the first for large animals.

The Harbin Veterinary Research Institute was directly connected to the Military Veterinary Research Institute, a major center for biowarfare studies, whose personnel have also infiltrated the virus programs at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston.

CHINESE MILITARY SCIENTISTS

The Harbin Veterinary Research Institute was the site of a major 2013 scientific scandal, when a team led by Professor Hualan Chen, director of China’s National Avian Influenza Reference Laboratory, conducted “gain of function” experiments, deliberately mixing the H5N1 bird-flu virus, which is highly lethal but not easily transmitted between people, with a 2009 strain of H1N1 flu virus, which is very infectious to humans.

By 2008, Zhiyuan Wen from the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute and Lei Pan and Ke Dong from the Fourth Military Medical University were being trained by Chinglai Yang and Ling Ye at Emory University and funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

By 2012, in addition to the PLA’s Fourth Military Medical University, Emory was collaborating directly with Hualan Chen, who was, at the same time, working with a key player in China’s biowarfare research program at the Military Veterinary Research Institute, Major General Xianzhu Xia.

The Emory studies with Hualan Chen were funded by the Public Health Service grant HHSN266200700006C from the NIH.

In 2017, Hualan Chen conducted what appears to be another “gain of function” study on avian influenza virus, genetically altering a virus, which permitted transmission from birds to guinea pigs and increasing the ability of the virus to replicate.

That research was funded by NIH CEIRS contract HHSN272201400004C, which was awarded to Emory University, but no one from Emory participated in the study, which gives the appearance of scientific money laundering.

Again in 2018, Hualan Chen received funding via Emory University’s NIH CEIRS contract HHSN272201400004C for research that involved only Chinese scientists at the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute.

It is interesting to note that Hualan Chen was trained at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia.

The flow of PLA scientists from the Fourth Military Medical University to Emory University continued through 2017 (Huizhong Zhang) and 2018

.Many of the Chinese scientists connected to Emory University still work with the PLA on influenza and other viruses, including COVID-19 with the present presumed head of China’s biowarfare program, Major General Chen Wei.

In April 2021, Anthony Fauci awarded Emory University an additional $1 million for influenza research.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com. Anna Chen can be followed on Twitter @2020Gladiator

PILLOW FIGHT

 

“We Heard You”: NAVY SEALs Sue Biden, Austin Following Former BUD/S Commanding Officer Captain Larry Bailey’s Interview On Caravan To Midnight Warning SEALs About COVID Vaccine

0
CAPTAIN LARRY BAILEY (SEAL) US NAVY (RETIRED) - JOHN B WELLS - CARAVAN TO MIDNIGHT

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | The American Report | November 13, 2021

Captain Larry Bailey (SEAL), U.S. Navy (Retired), was interviewed by host John B. Wells on the November 8, 2021 broadcast of Caravan to Midnight.

Captain Bailey previously ran the Naval Special Warfare Center where SEAL candidates undergo BUD/S training.

A group of NAVY SEALs prayed on the decision of whether or not to file a lawsuit over the COVID-19 vaccination mandate.

Then they heard Captain Bailey’s interview with John B. Wells on Caravan to Midnight.

The SEALs sent a message: “We heard you.”

The next day, 26 U.S. Navy SEALs,  five U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Crewmen, one U.S. Navy Explosive Ordinance Disposal Technician, and three U.S. Navy Divers filed a lawsuit against President Joe Biden, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, the U.S. Department of Defense, and Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro.


READ THE LAWSUIT FILED BY NAVY SEALS AGAINST PRESIDENT BIDEN, DEFENSE SECRETARY AUSTIN, THE U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, AND NAVY SECRETARY DEL TORO

INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT:

JBW:

In just a couple of minutes we are going to speak with Captain Larry Bailey, United States Navy (Retired,) (SEAL). Oh, yes.

He was assigned to SEAL Team Two, spent almost five years with them, participated in the Dominican Republic invasion, was deployed to Vietnam, where he led one of the first two East Coast SEAL Platoons into combat.

So, let’s talk to Captain Larry Bailey, United States Navy (SEAL), (Retired), right now. Captain Bailey, welcome to the program. It’s great to have you with us, sir. Thank you for coming on.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

You bet. Glad to do it.

JBW:

Well, this has become quite something, this note that you provided says “the survival rate of the COVID virus is 99.999 percent in our SEAL teams’ age range, so why even consider the vaccine when COVID-19 is no more a risk than ordinary flu to this population? And whereas the COVID vaccine, in particular in young men, has a history of myocarditis and blood clots, this is particularly true for those who must travel by air.”

So, captain, I invite you to just take it away, and when you hear the music rolling up, you’ll have less than a minute and we’ll take a break and we’ll come back and you just tell us what you want to tell us tonight.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

OK.

JBW:

So, how about it? Where shall we begin? Bioweapons. The vaccines are bioweapons. And, I’ll hand it over to you after that little short phrase.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Bioweapons…

JBW:

So, the vaccine’s a time bomb? Can you expand on this a little bit?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Well, you know, I don’t know much about bioweapons except I do know that they hurt you in very insidious ways. If they don’t kill you, they will make you an impotent or they will make you incapable of carrying out your mission, in the case of military guys.

And I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about what this does to the SEAL community because the SEALs have a very special place in the operational scheme of things. The Army and the Air Force have their own, and I think, from what I read, I have no inside information, from what I read, there are thousands and thousands of military people, including a lot of special operations people like SEALs, special forces, air commandos, etcetera, who are just not, who will take the hit and lose everything they have invested as far as a penalty for not following orders.

You know, it’s kind of a touchy situation to articulate and it’s really touchy for me because I’ve had my first two shots. That’s the last two shots I’ll have.

Well, I got my shots early on when it seemed like that was the thing to do. And I wasn’t going to do it, but I’m 82 years old and I figured, well, if I die, no one is going to miss me.

If I were a 25 year old guy in SEAL teams, I would not get those shots because there are several factors involved. One is it might make me less able to accomplish my mission. You mentioned in the airplanes. Two, it’s downright unconstitutional. We were all expected to get polio shots when we were kids, but that’s quite a bit different from the shots we’re given now because we don’t know what they are going to do to us. We simply do not know.

JBW:

You know, captain, what is especially disturbing is at our aggregator site, news aggregator site, Jellyfish.news, we all know what a jellyfish is, you start off with one problem, now you’ve got two. The headline reads, “Chinese Communist Party Bosses Discuss Vaccine Impact On USA Military Forces” and they say, quote, “everyone who took the vaccine is dead.”

Now, I don’t roll with everything that comes out of that bunch. However, that is a rather disturbing thing to say. We’ll carry on our conversation with Captain Larry Bailey, United States Navy (SEAL), (Retired).

Captain Larry Bailey, native of Marshall, Texas, graduate of Steven F. Austin State College. He spent almost 27 years as a U.S. Navy SEAL.  Obtained his commission from Navy Officer Candidate School in 1962. First assigned to the Destroyer U.S.S. Leary before receiving orders to Underwater Demolition Team training at Little Creek, Virginia. After a year in UDT 22, he was assigned to SEAL Team Two. I told you, he spent almost five years with them and participated in the Dominican Republic invasion and deployed to Vietnam. Led one of the first two SEAL Team Platoons into combat. But, there’s more.

He commanded Naval Special Warfare Center, where all SEALs are trained, for three years, before he retired from the U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, Florida. He retired from the U.S. Navy in 1990 after a 27 year career as a SEAL officer. His career included duty in the U.S., Panama, Bolivia, Scotland, Columbia, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Graduate of the Armed Forces Staff College and the U.S. Army’s Foreign Area Officer School. Holds an undergraduate degree in history from Stephen F. Austin State College in Texas and a Masters Degree in education from East Carolina University.

Also headed up “Kerry Lied Rally,” an effort to put thousands of people in front of the U.S. Capitol on September 22, 2004 for an event intended to tell the truth about Vietnam veterans and to counter the lies John Kerry told them.

You see who we are talking to tonight.

Captain Bailey’s most significant military assignment was as commanding officer of the Naval Special Warfare Center where all Navy SEALs undergo basic and advanced training.

He’s currently a freelance consultant and writer on military affairs who has been published numerous times in the national press. Since his retirement, Captain Bailey has been involved in issues of national policy. He’s founder of Gathering of Eagle since 2007. He’s also been Co-Chair of Special Operations Speaks, an organization that speaks out on defense-related issues, particularly those involving special operations forces.

He and his wife Judy live in beautiful North Carolina and they are the parents of two adult children.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

I’m sure glad to hear what I’ve done, because I forget it at times.

JBW:

I ask this question all the time. Can you believe you did all that stuff?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

It was a great career and I thank the U.S. taxpayer for paying my salary to do the things that I enjoyed the most.

Things have changed now. We’ve got the military throughout the ranks has got a lot more political I think than it was ever in my time. I didn’t have to compete against lieutenant commanders and commanders. As long as I did my job I was gonna pretty much reassured of getting promoted. But these guys now — it’s not universally true because there are some notable exceptions — you know, guys talk about the flag officers, the admirals, and even the generals, the“oh, he just sucked up to his bosses,” and they were either those who did everything by the numbers to get promoted, then they didn’t do the things that logic and common sense and even their good sense told them to do.

I’m saying all that to lead up to the very top. We are reaping a whirlwind that we sowed when we elected Barack Obama, and sleepy Joe is just carrying on what Obama started, with a lot of help from Obama’s friends. Joe Biden doesn’t know what he’s doing, as we all know. What he does do is the bidding of his masters, and his top two masters I think are Michelle and Barack Obama.

Now, of course, Hillary is still up there. She rules a big stick. But these are the people who gave us General Austin to be Secretary of Defense, who gave us General Milley to be the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Now, I don’t know too much about the admirals and the Air Force General and the Marine Generals, the chief of the service.

But, if you go on down to the next levels, I don’t think you are going to find too many people who have got a lot of character.

They certainly don’t have enough character to resign before they condemn their subordinates to a life of at least of discomfort and maybe even of disability. And I think we don’t know that yet, but I think that Dr. Malone will tell you that we haven’t begun to see the harm that we are causing ourselves by obeying an illegitimate order.

And I would like to think that the best of ourselves, but if I were still commanding officer at BUD/S, Basic UDC / SEAL Training, I would like to think that I would resign before I would require my Corpsmen, Hospital Corpsmen to inject whatever it is they are being told to inject into young SEALs. These guys have their whole lives and their whole careers ahead of them and if I could do something to protect them, I’ll do it. Now, of course, my resigning is not going to do much more than draw attention to it, but it’s still, it’s something I should do if I was still out there and it’s something that some general officers and admirals should do right now rather than continue to follow the orders of these people at the top of our food chain.

JBW:

I’ll tell you what’s disturbing is, well, there’s a whole bunch of disturbing stuff. What are we going to do about these, wasn’t it something like 18,000 SEALs, some ridiculously high number of SEALs in jeopardy of being fired if they don’t get this vaccine?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Well, there aren’t that many SEALs. That’s probably all of the special operations forces to include U.S. Army Special Forces, the Marine regiment. And I don’t know, but there are going to be some people who will pay a price for it. If they refuse to get the shot, one of the first things you are going to do is get kicked out of the military. And the secretary of defense has implied that they are going to lose all of their military benefits. Now, there are going to be some interesting things there like, there are going to be some people right close to retirement or within their eligibility years to retire, and because they don’t get the shot, the threat was to take away their retirement pay, take away their VA eligibility, to take away their medical rights.

So, there are a lot of things that nobody has talked through that are going to hurt not just individuals, it will hurt our country because they can no longer do their jobs.

JBW:

You know, we only have a few minutes here, but what I would like to do, if it’s alright with you, is, here in a few minutes we’ll do our bottom of the hour break, but don’t hang up when we go to commercials this next time. I want to give you just five, six minutes to just maybe wrap up a little bit…

…Let me ask you this question Captain. What do you do, that you can say, at Naval Special Warfare Center and these operations. Are we talking Zodiac boats and beach landings and stuff like that or, how deeply involved are you in strategy before anybody is sent to do anything?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Well, we have, or we had while I was there, I don’t know if it’s still there or not, we had a group of officers, lieutenant commanders and commanders, who just sat around, and after they get their exercises, they sat around all day and just talked about what they should be doing, what they should think about, what we will look like as a community in the future. And we call them the Strategy and Tactics Group. Now, they would write papers and show them to the admiral and the admiral would show them to the … and that was the ideal situation.

But, I was kind of cut out of it because I didn’t have too much need to know. But, they talked about top things that I’m not paying attention about, that I’m paid to pay their salaries. But, we did very little classified-type training. You run a lot and you swim a lot. And you learn to dive, and you learn to shoot, loot, tattoo and take pictures as we call it, and you learn how to perform small unit tactics.

Let me just tell you about one of the things that was the comeuppance of the ultimate of what we train them to do. Two years ago, I think, there was a Brit, and I think it was a British woman too, that were taken hostage by some Somalis, al-Shabaab or I don’t know which group it was, but somehow we were, other people were able to locate them, and it was like a, kind of a small force, as I understand it.

Now, these bad guys were holding these two Europeans hostage and they found out where they were, and these SEALs went in there, flew in at 10,000 feet and jumped out of the airplane and at free-fall from about eight down to about two thousand feet, pulled their parachutes, linked up, in the middle of the night now, and they were trained enough in navigation at night, and, of course, they had night vision devices to show them where they were going. These guys got together and hiked something like five kilometers and found where they were supposed to be, and they caught these guys completely by surprise, killed all of them, rescued the woman, I think the Brit was killed or vice versa, one of the hostages was killed, the other one was rescued, and they didn’t even know what was happening until they said “come with us.”  And I think the woman was rescued and the Brit’s body was expatriated.

So that’s the kind of thing that we train our kids to do when they are in basic training. Of course, after they get out of basic training, they go to some specialized parachute schools, but they’ve been given the basic training at Special Warfare Center. So, that’s the loop I’m taking you around to educate the types of really tough missions that the post graduate SEALs are capable of doing, and do from time to time.

JBW:

Given everything you know about the current situation, and you’re right exactly right, I’ve been saying Obama is running things from two miles up the block from the White House, for the entirety. In fact, he’s the one who is running Brennan and Christopher Wray and all of those other mugs.

But, here’s the thing. If you can stay with us for just a couple more minutes after this break here, with where we talk to the doctor, what do you see happening here? What do you see, Captain?

…People are calling it asymmetrical warfare. I think it’s more like three dimensional chess. I think it’s multi-level. There’s a multi level strategy that is hitting us high and hitting us low and hitting in the middle. So, maybe you can tell us your opinion of what’s happening to us when we come back after this short break. I’m John B. Wells. We are visiting with Captain Larry Bailey, USN SEAL, (Retired). Stand by. More to come.

…Where else do you hear about this stuff over the public airwaves. Captain Larry Bailey, USN SEAL (Retired) writes that vaccine spike proteins enter cell nuclei, suppress DNA repair engine of the human body. Only, COVID-19 vaccines are full-length spike protein vaccines which a scientific article claims causes genetic damage in its test tube study. It’s a potentially long term adverse effect that can’t be discounted. More studies need to be done, of course. But again, it should generate additional concerns about these vaccines. Perhaps that’s the most important message to focus on with the American people.  That the vaccine spike protein enters cell nuclei, suppresses DNA repair engine of the human body, thus the vaccine permanently and irreparably damages the body and its ability to repair and heal itself.

So, Captain Bailey, what is happening to this country and can we pull it out of the toilet which it seems to be going into?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

I just don’t know. I would first observe that the people who are talking about MRNAs and spike proteins, etcetera, etcetera, they are the ones who ought to be spending their time doing that, and not telling soldiers and sailors, airmen and marines that they are going to lose their benefits if they don’t get shots. They don’t know enough about the shots to direct them to do anything. That’s kind of the sum total of where I’m coming from.

But, I would also say, if I were the president, I would call up my flag and general officers in and say “you either resign or retract the orders because we don’t know enough about what is going on to continue to threaten people with loss of their careers and retirement pay. I just happen to know, and I don’t need to have had a lot of test tube experiments run, to understand what is happening.

When you’ve got states like they have in India with 241 million people thereabouts, and they have nobody dying these days, because they’ve given them ivermectin, and I should point out that I couldn’t find any type of tablet form of ivermectin, so I went to the hardware store, and I bought some that said to cows and horses, but it’s OK for people too, you just have to be a little bit more careful about how you dole it out.

But, having said that, and knowing the results of not only the state of Uttar Pradesh in India, but the state of Goa in India, they’ve had fantastic results. They are not rich enough to pay several hundred dollars to give shots to all of their population, so they go with what they could get and they got the ivermectin, and it worked.

And, what can be done on this side, is for the military to lead the way in using ivermectin…

…I took the Moderna shots, and the more I read about the Moderna vaccine, the more frightened I get. But, like I mentioned earlier, John, I’m 82 years old and I consider myself a test tube baby.

The military ought to be taking the lead on testing ivermectin and the hydroxychloroquine as well.

JBW:

Last question. Are you involved in anything as far as officially, well, non-officially raising awareness about this? Do you have any influence over this? Is anyone listening?

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Only peripherally. I’m a member of Citizens Commission on National Security, and they are pointing out things like we are talking about. And I used to be one of the founding members of Special Operations Speaks, and since we’ve had a couple of major political events up in Washington, we’ve kind of dissolved as an organization, but one third of us, there were three of us who started the organization, one guy is left, and that’s a fellow named Ken Benway, a retired Special Forces colonel. And Ken is doing a marvelous job in doing things like you were doing now, organizing radio programs and trying to make people understand what’s at stake here.

JBW:

Very good. Well, God bless you. Thank you very, very much for all those years of service and for your continued service, and with the Lord’s help, we’ll rescue this thing, but, I’ll tell you, our Lady Liberty is in trouble right now and I think that we had better recognize it, we better get on it in any way we can. The Patton method. Rifle’s out? Use a pistol. Pistol’s out? Throw it at them. Pistol’s gone? Pick up a rock. You know the rest of it. Thank you sir.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Keep up the good work.

JBW:

You do the same.

CAPTAIN BAILEY:

Thank you.

JBW:

Captain Larry Bailey, everybody. United States Navy SEAL. That’s serious. Serious stuff. He knows what he is talking about.

COPYRIGHT 2021 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES

Reports Coming Out Of China Indicate That Another Laboratory Leak Of Covid-19 Has Occurred At Another China Institution

0
NEW COVID-19 LAB LEAK - EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - THE AMERICAN REPORT — 1280

By Lawrence Sellin | November 13, 2021

According to a just-received November 12, 2021 Chinese language text and supported by other sources in China, there has been a presumed laboratory leak of COVID-19 at East China University of Science and Technology.

(A cursory translation of the above indicates that the school has been closed due to a new COVID-19 being released and the whole school has to be tested.)

Allegedly, laboratory workers tested positive for COVID-19 after conducting experiments involving the insertion of COVID-19 genetic material into the bacterium E.coli as an expression vector for COVID-19 proteins.

The text states that East China University of Science and Technology has been closed in relation to COVID-19 infections of laboratory workers.

The Chinese source said that all mention of this event on social media has now been removed by authorities.

It is not clear in which laboratory the alleged COVID-19 leak occurred, but the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, Newworld Institute of Biotechnology at East China University of Science and Technology, particularly the laboratory of Dong-Zhi Wei, is known for using bacteria like E.coli as expression vectors.

DONG-ZHI WEI

This is an initial report. Further confirmation and additional information about this developing story will be provided if and when available.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com. 

PILLOW FIGHT

 

General Paul E. Vallely Interviews General Michael Flynn About US Elections, CRT In The Military, Border Security, Biden’s Afghanistan Surrender, And The Threat From China: FULL TRANSCRIPT

0
GENERAL VALLELY - GENERAL FLYNN - STAND UP AMERICA US FOUNDATION - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | The American Report | November 10, 2021

Major General Paul E. Vallely, USA (Ret.) interviewed Lieutenant General Michael T. Flynn, USA (Ret.) on November 4, 2021 on the Stand Up America U.S. Foundation Radio Show, hosted by General Vallely and U.S. Navy Submarine Veteran Don Smith.

“The Stand Up America US Project (SUA) was founded in 2005 by MG Paul E. Vallely, US Army (Ret), as a a public policy research organization formed (and existing) for the purpose of promoting discussion of the principles found in the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence and application of these principles to present public policy issues,” according to the Stand Up America US Foundation’s official website.

STAND UP AMERICA US FOUNDATION

The in-depth interview, lasting approximately 50 minutes, includes in-depth discussions between General Vallely and General Flynn on a wide range of topics including U.S. elections, critical race theory in the U.S. military, U.S. border security, Joe Biden’s Afghanistan surrender and the national security threat posed by Communist China.

The in-depth interview, lasting approximately 50 minutes, includes in-depth discussions between General Vallely and General Flynn on a wide range of topics including U.S. elections, critical race theory in the U.S. military, U.S. border security, Joe Biden’s Afghanistan surrender and the national security threat posed by Communist China.

GENERAL VALLELY - GENERAL FLYNN

The American Report presents the following exclusive full transcript of the entire program.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bClYIuT7OcU

“If we don’t fix the election system, the integrity of the system now, there’s no guarantee that the Democrats and these communists aren’t going to continue to illegally tap into our systems.”

— General Paul E. Vallely

“That we saw the surrender in Afghanistan. Eighty billions dollars plus of equipment, and I forecast [that] because I got some intel that the Chinese were going to move into Bagram weeks after it was turned over and that’s exactly what happened.” 

— General Paul E. Vallely

“So the 60,000 foot view you know of Afghanistan, particularly Afghanistan, is that the Chinese are the big winners.” — General Michael Flynn

“The Chinese want a port facility off Morocco which gives them not only an entry point to the Mediterranean but also gives them a powerful naval stance in the Atlantic like they have in the Pacific.” — General Michael Flynn

“What we lack in between the warfighters and those in the White House who are going to make a decision or not make a decision, we lack guts. We lack guts.” 

— General Michael Flynn

“Is this secretary of defense under some very strict orders? Not from Biden. He’s under strict orders from another element that’s still hanging around Washington.” 

— General Michael Flynn

“In 2017, I, with others, developed a border plan for the Pentagon and we actually sent it to the young man at National Security Council…it was a plan to not only strengthen our borders but to go on the offense and neutralize the cartels.”

— General Paul E. Vallely

“And I said ‘well, have Governor Abbott send a letter to General Austin, Secretary of Defense, and ask him if he has a plan to take down the cartels.’ And, of course, we know they don’t because they won’t come out and say it.”

— General Paul E. Vallely

FULL TRANSCRIPT

GENERAL VALLELY:

Good day everybody, and we would like to welcome a great patriot and warrior Lieutenant General Mike Flynn. We are very happy to have you on the Stand Up America US radio show.

Mike, this is a new show, we’ve been around for about ten episodes now and, anyhow, we’re building an audience, but we felt that we need to launch this radio show to really focus on the, I think the major things that the Stand Up America US Foundation focuses on, and that’s threats to America, foreign and domestic. We do a lot of studies on the threats to America. We did analysis for example on the Chinese Communist Party, which is in our archives called “Eyes on China.” We did another 80 on Canada, more in depth than even the CIA has produced that we could find, so I just wanted to give you a little background on that.

But I understand that today you have a new book coming out, or is it out already?

GENERAL FLYNN:

No, it’s not out yet, and it’s not really a book. I don’t want to call it a book. It’s a, I will say that I’m going to try to dub it as a, I describe it as “Letters from America,” and I’m going to try to describe it and capture it as a 21st century version of a Federalist Paper.

It’s about faith, it’s about faith, family, strength, courage, accountability, determination, perseverance, but I was only able to gain all of those things through the benevolence of the American people and my faith in God and certainly the strength of my own family.

It will be a little bit, probably. I’m done with the manuscript, part of it, and I’m having a friend do the copy editing, and then we’re going to put it out. And, you know, we’ll use it to raise some money for a non-profit, and the non-profit gives to family education, scholarship, and America First values, ideals, values, and principals.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Well, we look forward to that. As a matter of fact, General McInerney and I are working on a new book too. It’s called “America’s Endgame for the 21st Century” and it’s sort of a follow on from our book “Endgame: The Blueprint for Victory in the War on Terror” that we did in 2005 about the same time General McInerney and I founded the Stand Up America US Foundation.

You know, we have so many challenges today, Mike, and I know we can’t cover them all here today, but there’s a number of things that I’m concerned about, I listed about eleven of them in our article that I wrote. Compared to when Trump was in office, I think I had three concerns. We were concerned about the Chinese Communist Party, we were concerned about North Korea, we were concerned about the Iran nuclear threat. But now, that’s more than tripled because of all the threats coming from inside the United States versus all of those, or in addition to, all of the foreign threats.

But, I don’t want to go back to much in history, but I just got a note on Peter Navarro’s new book. You know, Peter really highlighted what happened in that last part of the election. I know General McInerney and I were working on encouraging martial law then because there were so many things to do, but then we found out that Trump probably didn’t have the solid team at the Pentagon to do martial law. And I know we communicated with Sidney Powell those times as well, but I’m just so concerned that we have people like Mike Pence. I couldn’t believe Mike Pence was the Brutus in this whole thing as Peter pointed out.

So, maybe just a few comments on those last few days and your experience with the President at that time and then we’ll go on to some other things.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Well, I think that there’s a lot of research that we’ve done and a lot of research that I did, and to really tout, and you guys let me know, I will help expand your audience by my own community network that I do have and that I like to use, so, because you do a lot of great, thorough research and much more. And I think it’s the kind of research that people actually need to read instead of listening to the soundbite media that we have.

But in order to really understand what is happening, here’s what I would say is that in the final days of the administration there was a lot of decisions that could have been made. I would say that the one single big thing that really I was upset about was the people around the President, you know like you know Paul, in the military, and I have always said this, that the best plan gives you the most options right up until the last possible minute on the battlefield.

So you want to have every single option laid out for you, particularly the President of the United States, every single option laid out, you know, best case to worst case, and you want to have all of the advantages and disadvantages to each one, all of the various ramifications were I to choose this option or were I to choose that option.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Those are all of the things Mike that we learned. Mike, that’s all of the things that we learned.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Exactly. And none of that was done. So none of that, that was not done. It was not done for the Presidency of the United States of America by the team that was around Trump. And I know Peter was one of the outspoken members of his team that he did listen to, but Peter’s only one guy and, you know, we’ve learned so much from over the last year let’s say, because we’re already a year into from November 3, 2020. So, even Peter has learned a lot but the team around Trump was not a team to protect American values and American principals and, frankly, American history nor the Constitution. They were a team that wanted to kind of “let’s get past this let’s get rid of this guy Trump,” I mean these were people that were “on his” quote unquote “team” and “let’s get him out of the way and let’s move on.”

So, jumping from the last days of the administration to probably the month of March or so, there was a belief by the media, by the left, by the powers in the White House, and by the titans at, people who would have stopped worrying about election integrity and they would have moved on and said “we’ve moved forward and started worrying about the next election when in fact it has not, in fact here we are a year later still talking about election integrity. I’ve been doing podcasts this week and I’ve been involved in other conversations with other people and election integrity comes up as the number one issue, that people do not trust our elections and in fact what we just saw in some pretty highly-visible elections in Virginia and in New Jersey, New Jersey is still at risk right now in terms of not just who won, it’s gone back and forth, but the outcome and, again, after one hundred percent of one particular county’s votes came in at midnight by one hundred percent were counted, I think it was Bergen County, all of a sudden another, I think the number is another 40,000 showed up.

So, there’s this sentiment in America that our election system is broken. In the Virginia election people go “well what about Virginia.” Well, Virginia has an entire county, Fairfax County, which you know, Fairfax County is not, I understand as of late last night something may have changed, I’ve been busy this morning, that Fairfax County has, I think that they have refused to show their vote count. And so, they haven’t actually put in their votes for Fairfax, I understand, are not going to change the outcome of the election in Virginia. So now they are like back paddling to not show it.

What Governor-elect Youngkin needs to do on day one is force an audit of Fairfax County because they are going to find incredible levels of corruption in Fairfax County. So corruption exists. I’m talking to you from the state of Florida. I can tell you that I’ve had it up to here with Ron DeSantis because Ron has done some great things on one hand, but on the other hand, there is fraud in the election system here in Florida, and so just because you won Ron doesn’t mean that there’s not fraud. So, you need to go ahead and look at that because, come the next election, and it’s not to run an audit so you can protect your rear end in the next election. It’s to run an audit to say as a state that went for, in this case, Trump in the 3 November 2020 election, and we know what the results were, but we have done canvassing down here in Florida that shows egregious corruption, egregious fraud, and you know, with these mail-in ballots.

So, the last days of the Trump Administration, where we are right now and where our country is heading, we must fix our election system, get rid of these machines. There is nothing wrong with going to pure paper ballots. You and I know both that the absentee ballot system is actually an effective system if it is done properly and done by the regs and the policies if you will, and because there are people who can’t make it to the voting booth on voting day. Those are invalids at assisted living centers or those are military deployed overseas, and there are other categories of people, not many. But most people can show up and vote, or you open it up for a couple of days if you want to run an early election process.

But you have it paper. We’ve got to go back to this. And I don’t care whether we’re in the 29th century, Paul. Paper-based elections are fine in a system that we have right now. If we don’t go to that and we pretend like we are going to use these electronic machines, then we better know who buys these machines, who owns these machines, the money that’s coming into these machines, what’s inside of these machines that we have paid for, that the taxpayers have paid for.

And you know and I know this. I know this in spades. If the chip technology that exists today, you know this Smartmatic software,  you know, where this stuff is made, whether it’s made in China or some other communist country, but it’s principally China.

So they can build in whatever they want into these machines. We’ve got to get rid of them. We’ve got to get rid of them. And I think that as the American people, as we go forward here, people need to remember that we are a republic. We’re not a democracy, right? A republic means that we vote for our elected officials and then those elected officials are supposed to represent what We the People, the republic form of government. We have a constitutional republic.

Democracy is sort of a free-for-all and hope for the best. We are a democratic form of government but the specific type of government is a republic and so We the People have reneged on our commitment to stay engaged in the lifeblood of the United States of America and we have given up many of our freedoms because we’ve just sort of backed away and said “ah, I’ll let the politicians handle it.”

Well, the politicians, the established politicians in this country, as we have seen, are just incredibly corrupt. It’s about money and power and actually, power is above money.

GENERAL VALLELY:

In all of the interviews I have been doing, we keep hearing “we’ve got to wait for the 2022 elections, everything is going to change, the presidential in 2024. But like you were emphasizing, if we don’t fix the election system, the integrity of the system now, there’s no guarantee that the Democrats and these communists aren’t going to continue to illegally tap into our systems.

“If we don’t fix the election system, the integrity of the system now, there’s no guarantee that the Democrats and these communists aren’t going to continue to illegally tap into our systems.”

— General Paul E. Vallely

GENERAL FLYNN:

Exactly what they’ve been doing.

Big time fraud. And you and I aren’t throwing out the word “communist” like just a name call, right? I mean, the Communist Party of America and the Democratic Socialist Party of America which are aligned like that, they are very real in this country. They have been around for a long, long time. The Communist Party of America goes back to pre-World War One. So, they’ve been around a long time. And even before that, the sentiment of communism went back. I mean, there’s some great history even during our period of the Civil War and then the Reconstruction after the Civil War. So, this idea of control of the masses has been around for a long time. And so, we are facing communism and we are facing communism in America like we have never had before. It’s always been there before, but now it’s actually taking over the federal government and elements of the federal government.

You know, the Deep State is not, I tell people this all of the time, the Deep State is not Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. They are products of the Deep State. The Deep State is really the, what Eisenhower, you know when Eisenhower left the presidency, in his final speech to the American public he warned us. He didn’t give us a big rosy speech. He warned us, and he warned us about something called the military industrial complex because he knew it. He knew it was growing and it was growing. This was in the late 1960s, 1961 as I think when he gave it.

But now what I say, we not only have a military industrial complex, but we also have a security state complex that’s part of that. And the security state complex is the Deep State. That is the swamp. That is the large, bloated intelligence community that’s out of control, that’s unaccountable to anybody. It is the agencies and activities that do things in a very nefarious way.

The Justice Department is part of it because they are an arm of the Security State. In fact, in some cases, they lead the Security State, particularly the federal law enforcement. And they are unaccountable. They are unaccountable to anybody. When was the last time you heard of a prosecutor being indicted for lying to a judge? I mean, it doesn’t happen.

So, we are in a deep, deep state of crisis right now. And I’m not going to kid anybody, and I tell people, you know, my sort of phrase is “local action has a national impact.” And I encourage people to get involved in their local communities like they’ve never been involved before. And there are going to be those of us who fight and go and get the word out about what is happening in the federal government, what is happening. You know, it’s sort of another echelon of government activity, and we’ll keep people informed, but, most people don’t have the platforms that I have, that you have, that others that we know have.

And that’s OK, but the platforms that they do have is within their communities. At their school boards, and I’m talking about people that are my age too that maybe don’t even have kids in school anymore but they certainly might have a grandchild or a grandson or granddaughter in school. So, use the wisdom of your age and your experience and maybe go into these school boards. Maybe go run for school board if you’re in my category.

I mean, I’m still fighting at the national level and at the international level for this country. But maybe one of these days if God gives me the grace to continue on in my life, maybe one of these days I’ll, when I stop having this platform and when I stop doing this, I’ll go down the street here and I’ll run for school board and, you know, Kattie bar the door, because they won’t be teaching critical race theory or pornography in the school system that they are doing right now.

One other comment, and I’ll stop for a second and see if you have any questions. This guy George Soros, OK, because people go “ahh, he’s a conspiracy theory.” No he’s not. He’s a real person. He’s got a real organization, and he’s got a foundation that has billions of dollars. And so when you talk about George Soros getting involved in state and community, local community-level activities, it’s very real.

So, George Soros gets behind attorneys general races in states, right? Why attorney general? Because of what we just talked about. Accountability.

George Soros has foundations. Parts of his foundations get involved in local school boards in certain states that they don’t currently own. OK. These are very real things. All you’ve got to do is go look at some of the money, and I’ve done this, You’ve got to go look at some of the money, where the money’s coming from to help somebody run for a school board election. I mean, a school board election used to be, you could run if you had, maybe if you put, if you paid a thousand bucks and you put placards and you put them around your town.

Now we’re talking about millions of dollars to get a school board seat in a county? Why? Why is that the case? And part of it is to continue the culturalization of the American people and American society through education. Our Department of Education, the big building that sits in Washington D.C., needs to be abolished. They do nothing. Nothing for states and nothing for local communities. Nothing.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Reagan wanted to do that. It can happen.

GENERAL FLYNN:

It can happen. I mean, we need a president. And Trump, one of the things because I didn’t have a lot of time with Trump, and I still do. But Trump didn’t understand the federal government. That’s a weakness in his arm or that he didn’t understand. So he needed people around him and I was one of them. And then they got rid of me, right? They did a masterful job of getting rid of me early on because they knew exactly what I was going to do.

The executive power of the President of the United States can do extraordinary things. There are three equal branches of government, yes, in our constitutional republic but there is only one president, and the president has extraordinary authorities and power given to him by the Constitution.

So, he did not know the ins and outs, the strengths and weaknesses of the federal government and the federal bureaucracy and he needed somebody around him to do that and frankly, he didn’t have anybody around him to do that after I left, to include the Vice President.

GENERAL VALLELY:

That became obvious. Let me just switch gears a little bit. General McInerney and I and General Joe Arbuckle stood up Flag Officers 4 America. These are retired generals and admirals that were basically supporting America First and duty, honor, country and so on and so forth and it has been very effective. We have over 250 now general officers and admirals signed up for that.

But, here’s my question. I want to go to the leadership and as I look at the threats out there right now, I look particularly at China, their growing capabilities in space, their fleets, their army, the threat against the takeover of Taiwan which is right on their radar — they are going to do it one way or the other — but I’m concerned about the four-star generals and admirals that we have.

That we saw the surrender in Afghanistan. Eighty billions dollars plus of equipment, and I forecast because I got some intel that the Chinese were going to move into Bagram weeks after it was turned over and that’s exactly what happened, to increase their influence for their silk belt road initiative. And Colonel Sellin, Larry Sellin, an intel officer that I think you know, he and I worked very carefully on that whole area, but I’m not sure we have the generals and admirals — as a matter of fact I know we don’t — that are going to stand up and protect America. Just your thoughts on how we fix that.

President Barack Obama at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan

“That we saw the surrender in Afghanistan. Eighty billions dollars plus of equipment, and I forecast [that] because I got some intel that the Chinese were going to move into Bagram weeks after it was turned over and that’s exactly what happened.” 

— General Paul E. Vallely

GENERAL FLYNN:

Yeah, so, first of all, we surrendered to the enemy in Afghanistan and we retreated under fire, and we left American citizens behind enemy lines. There’s no ifs, ands, or buts about that. Everybody knows it. The flag officers we have, to include the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, if they presented a plan to do anything but that to the President of the United States and the President didn’t accept it and decided to do what we have witnessed then there’s at least three four-stars that need to resign or should have resigned immediately because it was an immoral, unethical, and illegal order to follow to surrender and retreat under enemy fire and leave American citizens behind.

And the fact that they didn’t tells you everything you need to know about the senior leadership of our armed forces. Either they’re weak — they’re not incompetant — that means that they’re complicit in the way that we exited Afghanistan. 

So the 60,000 foot view you know of Afghanistan, particularly Afghanistan, is that the Chinese are the big winners. 

So, and they have superb international relationships, geopolitical relationships with Pakistan. They have now, they basically own Afghanistan, they are already on Bagram Air Field and they’re basically running Bagram Air Field.

They have their Belt and Road Initiative up in the northern tiers of the Central Asian republics and they’ve signed one of the largest military and trade agreements with Russia, actually, during the Obama Administration, which most people don’t know about. It’s public. The details of it are not, but the fact that they signed that deal.

So, this has been going on for a long time. There is also a southern tier from China that they have been working on since really about 2007 you can go back to the days of the Somali pirates when we had a flotilla of an international body off of Somalia to stop the pirates from taking over all of these container ships. Well, the Chinese joined in that, and when the Chinese joined in, this is the first time that Chinese warships left the South China Sea and actually then transited all the way over to the Arabian Sea and now they…

Well, over that period of time from 2007 to 2021, they have now built a second Suez Canal, so the Chinese built a second Suez Canal, most people don’t know that, and it runs parallel to the current Suez Canal that we built, and so China actually owns a transit through the Red Sea that is a really, really important strategic passageway to get from, you know, to get from basically the southern tier of the world, the Arabian Sea up through the Mediterranean, and they have port facilities not only in eastern Africa, Djibouti, they are building another one off of Nigeria, and they have one off of Algiers.  They have one off of Algiers. You are going to see Algeria and Morocco and you are going to see tension between Algeria and Morocco in the coming years unlike we’ve ever seen because the Chinese want a port facility off Morocco which gives them not only an entry point to the Mediterranean but also gives them a powerful naval stance in the Atlantic like they have in the Pacific.

And then you take it to Taiwan.  And so Taiwan is a place, and you mentioned Larry Sellin, Lawrence Sellin. You know, I hope that you guys post all of his stuff on your website because it’s terrific.

GENERAL VALLELY:

We do.

GENERAL FLYNN:

He’s absolutely brilliant. He’s a brilliant, courageous writer. Yes he is, he’s terrific. And so, I share, I get his stuff on a list we have and I share that routinely.

But Taiwan, Taiwan is a place where the Chinese want to take it without firing a shot. They’re massively threatening all that, Taiwan. And that is a very strategic island, the former island of Formosa, the current island of Taiwan. Very strategic island to have. You know, never mind that China sees it as, you know, One China, right? It’s strategic because it is a buffer if you will, within that region of the world, with the Islands of Japan, right? South Korea, Philippines and the Philippine Basin and then other countries that are still relatively aligned with the United States, although I am very, very deeply concerned about Australia.

So, that’s sort of a strategic, that’s a geostrategic view for your listening audience to have. Now, where will our military be? I know we still have warriors in our military. I know that we still have a non-commissioned officer corps that is still, you know, they are still the lifeblood and the binding that holds this military book together. And I know that we still have leaders at some very significant levels that are warriors and warfighters.

What we lack in between the warfighters and those in the White House who are going to make a decision or not make a decision, we lack guts. We lack guts.

“What we lack in between the warfighters and those in the White House who are going to make a decision or not make a decision, we lack guts. We lack guts.”

— General Michael Flynn

And when I say guts, we lack the internal fortitude, the internal courage to do the right thing knowing that to take the easier path is a path that would be politically correct but morally, ethically, and frankly, in many cases, illegally correct. Right? It would be illegal.

So, the guts that we must find in our leaders, and I hope that they exist out there. I know that some of them, I know that some exist. You know sometimes, and I’ll say and I’ll shut up on this issue. Sometimes guys when they get to a certain level of leadership, when they know things are screwed up politically, they’ll say “well, if I stay in I can help make the right decisions, I can provide the best advice.” And they get to a place where they’re so senior and then they say “well, gee, I quit, should I resign?”

It didn’t bother me one bit when I was told “you’re no longer, your services are no longer needed,” and when I sat there and I asked two questions, and the first question was “is it a function of my leadership?” And immediately, the immediate answer was “No Mike, it’s not a function of your leadership. We think you’re a great leader. It’s because of other issues.”

And I said “I got it. Is it because of my stand on these enemies that we’re facing and we have an administration that doesn’t want to face up to those enemies,” and it was, you know, very uncomfortable rear-end-moving-in-the-chair answer and I said “no problem. I’m good. Here’s the timeline that I would ask you to allow me to step down from the military from an appointed position by the President of the United States and one hundred percent confirmed by the United States Senate, twice that happened to me, and I had no problems taking my stars at that moment, in a figurative sense, and saying “OK. I’m done. No problem.”

I didn’t feel bad about it. I wasn’t going to sit there and go “You know, if you leave me in I can kind of, you know, I can play the political game.”

Bullshit. Not in my fiber.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Well you stood your ground. You stood up.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Yeah. And I hope and pray that we have, and I believe that we do have some military leaders at the three and four star level. Because those are the levels where it really does come down to, you know, publicly, you know what I mean, a division commander can do that, and the media, particularly this media and the government would hide all of that. They would call the guy out like they tried to call me out in the media, but you know, as people dig in they go “Geez, you know. This guy, you know, here’s a reason why he was let go.”

So, are we there in the United States military today? I don’t think we’re there yet. Is this secretary of defense under some very strict orders? Not from Biden. He’s under strict orders from another element that’s still hanging around Washington.

“Is this secretary of defense under some very strict orders? Not from Biden — he’s under strict orders from another element that’s still hanging around Washington.” 

— General Michael Flynn

GENERAL VALLELY:

Biden is a puppet.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Yeah. Right.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Did you know Biden is a puppet? Obama’s running that through Susan Rice in the Executive Office Building, you know that. And Obama’s a puppet.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Yeah. Yeah.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Let me take just something that happened last week. I interviewed a young man that just left West Point. West Point changed its leadership and warriorship back in the 80s when they started hiring a lot of professors from the Ivy League schools. And a very good friend of mine, Colonel Tex Turner, head of the Ranger School, wanted to establish warriorship back into the department of tactics and so on. And, of course, he was retired early. They didn’t want that.

Now, in the last month, we’ve had a number of cadets and midshipmen leave the academies because of masking and CRT. Now, they came out and said “Well, they’re not teaching CRT.” But they are. This came from the cadets. They put young men and women together who wouldn’t get the vax and basically harassed them for weeks coming out of summer training into the fall. Many of the athletes didn’t want to get vaxxed. So we have that going on at our academies where we are supposed to grow our warriors for the future.

But they’re not tolerating. These young people aren’t stupid. But they’re not going to tolerate.

GENERAL FLYNN:

I just was told this morning, and I don’t know the guy. But he’s a professional hockey player, I guess just died of this myocarditis, you know, professional hockey player. These guys are, when we talk about cadets at West Point, these are some of the most healthy people that you’re going to be around. You know, these are athletes. They’re just super healthy. One of the things that we got away from, and we got away from this a long time. I’m not a West Point person. I was in a very good ROTC program at a state university but, you know, I mean, young officers, we don’t need young officers to be, these are smart kids anyways, right?

GENERAL VALLELY:

They are.

GENERAL FLYNN:

I mean, these are high performing, intelligent. I want people to be warriors. I want four years to teach people tactics 101 on a battlefield in the most difficult of times and I want people who have experienced combat and I want people who have experienced fear and I want people who are fearless, who have demonstrated courage, but who are also understanding of who we are as a nation and what is in our fabric. That’s who I want teaching our young people in these military academies.

And I want them to be fair. I want them to look past, I want them to be the type of people who don’t, excuse my Irish, give a shit about the person’s color of their skin, you know, or their faith, but I want them to understand that they, these are people that have to be, they have to believe in our country. What I want out of a graduate out of West Point is I want a fearless warrior who understands basic tactics, understands basic elements of warfare, and then they go off and they can get training in logistics or training in transportation or training in aviation or training in infantry or intelligence or all these other things.

And the same goes for the Air Force Academy, same goes for the Navy Academy. The Navy Academy, the crazy superintendent that they got down there now, he created a “safe space” for midshipmen at the Navy Academy in case they have, you know, a problem with their day, right? Well, there’s no “safe space” on a burning ship, you know, the submariner who’s part of your team. No, there’s no “safe space” on a submarine, I mean, give me a break.

GENERAL VALLELY:

No safe space. Yeah. No safe space.

GENERAL FLYNN:

There’s no “safe space” on the battlefield. The “safe space” is “get your head down and move forward,” you know, and it’s always forward.

So, we need warriors in our military. As you get more and more senior, that’s why we have the staff colleges and we have these war colleges and we allow guys and gals to go off to the other institutions to become bigger intelects, right? And so, what we’ve done is we’ve tried to make the academies into these Ivy League institutions to learn about different things.

GENERAL VALLELY:

That’s right. That’s right. Yup.

GENERAL FLYNN:

No! These are warfighting institutions to create warriors. That’s what it’s about. And, I mean, I probably spent too much time in my ROTC department down at the gymnasium because I loved it. I loved it. And, you know, I knew I was going to go into the army when I was a little kid, but I wasn’t a great student, I mean, until I buckled down. But what I was, was a fighter. Because you grow up in a family of nine Irish kids in a small family, you know, with a father who was a retired [unintelligible – possibly master] sergeant World War II and Korea vet, you know, that’s, life is tough because life is not fair. That’s what I want these kids to learn, that life is not fair.

Korean War Medal awarded to General Michael Flynn’s Father Charles Francis Flynn

GENERAL VALLEY:

That’s right. You probably don’t know, but Vallely is Irish as well. We come from County Tyrone and Dungannon, Northern Ireland, so I just thought I would let you know you have a fellow Irishman here.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Yeah, there you go. You were OK with the O’Neill clan. You were probably part of the O’Neill clan up there. I’ve got O’Neills in my family. And O’Neill clan, if anybody looks at the history of Ireland and looks at the O’Neill clan, that was a tough [unintelligible] up there.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Oh yeah. Dungannon and all that area.

GENERAL FLYNN:

That’s what we need for our military and that’s what I hope and I pray that our military is, you know, still does that. You know, when they say they are not teaching CRT, yes they are. They just changed the name like they changed the names of some of our school systems around the country. They changed it to some kind of socialization process, right? 

GENERAL VALLELY:

They change it. That’s exactly.

Hey, let’s get on to one other thing. I know we are restricted here a little bit. I wish we could do two or three hours but…

So anyhow, in 2017, I with others developed a border plan for the Pentagon and we actually sent it to the young man at National Security Council then, I’m trying to think of his name.

But anyhow, it was a plan to not only to strengthen our borders but to go on the offense and neutralize the cartels. And we laid out a special ops operation, covert, working with certain members of the Mexican Marinas [Marines] and special ops down that could be trusted.

So, anyhow, it didn’t go anywhere. They built the wall and they, Trump did a great job down there. Just a superb job. Well, still, we were playing defense.

So, about a month ago, I talked to a mayor down at Del Rio and he said “I understood you had a border plan developed to neutralize the cartels” and I said “yes.” He says “I’m meeting with [Texas] Governor Abbott tomorrow and I want to take that plan up,” so I sent it to him.

But here, I started getting blowback that that would be a cross-border operation. So I said, “well what do you think Iraq was, what do you think Syria was, what do you think Afghanistan was — it was a cross-border operation. And here we have more lives being taken because of what the cartels are doing with fentanyl and everything else than we lost in the Middle East in 20 years.

And so, here again, they are so frustrated down there. And I said “well, have Governor Abbott send a letter to General Austin, Secretary of Defense, and ask him if he has a plan to take down the cartels.” And, of course, we know they don’t because they won’t come out and say it.

“And I said ‘well, have Governor Abbott send a letter to General Austin, Secretary of Defense, and ask him if he has a plan to take down the cartels.’ And, of course, we know they don’t because they won’t come out and say it.”

— General Paul E. Vallely

But here we have a real enemy that’s creating so much havoc, so much death in America, sex trafficking, now they are militarized Mike, and you probably know this. They have better vehicles and arms than the Mexican Army does. They have drones, their communication, their transfer of money. But yet, we don’t have a plan to protect and go on the offense. I say again, “give me a break.” I don’t understand that. I just throw that out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyVGiJacQqI&t=63s

GENERAL FLYNN:

So, here’s a couple things. Here’s a couple things because I’m going to have to end here shortly.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Sure.

GENERAL FLYNN:

And I appreciate being on. You can go into military manuals, you know, some of these tactical manuals, and you can look up “Breaking Contact with the Enemy.” “Breaking Contact with the Enemy.” And when you look at “Breaking Contact with the Enemy,” there are different aspects of what you do in order to successfully break contact with the enemy and at the same time return to the offense, right? Because, typically, if you are going to break contact with the enemy it’s because you are probably not doing so well. So, we’re not doing so well right now, but it doesn’t mean that you break contact and you pull back and you retreat like we tried to do in Afghanistan and we were unable to. We unsuccessfully broke contact with the enemy there.

So, now let’s talk about the border of the United States of America, the southern border specifically, because of the dramatic ability of these Mexican cartels, which are actually unifying even more so than they ever unified before. So, there used to be five or six of these cartels. Now it’s actually, it’s almost becoming one giant one, like their own nation state.

So, we can actually effectively break contact, but we have to do certain things and there are ways to do that. And the wall was one of them, how we do law enforcement operations on the border, how we do interagency operations on the border, how we work effectively with, in this case, elements of the Mexican government.

And you’re right, the marines, the naval component of the Mexican military and the special operations, there is a small, a couple of small branches of them, because you have to question who you can trust. So how we work with, you know, the other side.

Zones, Z-O-N-E-S that we create in order to say these are no-man, these are no-go zones, and if you are operating in those zones you are…

GENERAL VALLELY:

No-go zones. The exact words that were in our plan, Mike. That was in our plan.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Right. No, I know, I know. And I remember, I actually remember reading it. I think you had sent that to me as well and I remember reading it.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Yeah, I did.

GENERAL FLYNN:

And very effective, actually.

So, let me just take it back to tactics, because there is a sheriff that — I don’t really have any time for Abbott, I’m sorry. There’s a sheriff by the name of Coe, C-O-E. Sheriff Coe, and he’s in charge of Kinney County, which is a border county on the Mexican-Texas border. Sheriff Coe went ahead and deputized a hundred men. And he’s trained them, he’s put them through some training, fairly rigorous training, because that’s his style.

And he said “Along our border we are going to build a fence, we are going to take what exists, we are going to continue to strengthen it,” and he told his fellow sheriffs to his left and to his right, to his north and to his south, he said, “They’re not coming in my county, so be prepared, they’re probably going to go into your county, and so if you don’t do what I’m doing, then you have to be ready to accept the burden of more illegals. But, I’m done accepting illegals in my county.”

And that’s what we need more sheriffs to do along the southern border.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Absolutely.

GENERAL FLYNN:

And I mean from the furthest down there in Brownsville all the way over to, you know, San Diego. And we know that we have certain sheriffs that are weak, that are left-leaning, and that are corrupt. We have to stop that.

The federal government, the federal government — CBP — who is a great organization, and there’s some others down there — ICE — there’s some great people who work in ICE, if they want to participate.

But a sheriff can actually say “This is my county. I’m not going to accept any federal help at all.”

Doesn’t need it. Doesn’t need to. Particularly along that border, particularly in Texas, with some of the laws…

GENERAL VALLELY:

Because he can deputize.

GENERAL FLYNN:

And he can deputize. And he did. And in this case, Coe deputized a hundred people. And that’s plenty. And these are guys on horseback. These are not people that are unfamiliar with weapons or weapons training. What they needed, and some of them are probably former military. But anyhow, so, they just need a little bit of training, a little bit of discipline, and a little bit of communications and capabilities, and they need to know their geographic territory that they are going to control, and they need to be given the backup that the sheriff provides.

So, if I deputize, just like in the days of the Wild, Wild, West, you know. Judges would deputize people who were brave and could do stuff. So, I mean, this is not movie stuff, this is real. This is what’s happening in our country today.

GENERAL VALLELY:

It’s not that difficult to plan like you were talking about earlier to do it.

GENERAL FLYNN:

No.

GENERAL VALLELY:

Well listen, I need you need to go. We are going to work very closely with you, and we’ll get you back on periodically and where I can help you out I’ll be more than happy to.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Good. Yeah, please do. And, just like that list of I think guys like [Colonel Lawrence] Sellin, I think, how you guys, I think that your site, often, let me know how I can expand it for you because you have good research documents on your site and, you know, I just want to thank [Navy Submarine Veteran] Don [Smith]. Don knows that there’s no “safe spaces” on submarines.

NAVY SUBMARINE VETERAN DON SMITH:

No. None. Well thank you General. This has been great for me to sit and listen to you two generals talk. It’s been awesome. We could do this, I could do this all day, anyway. So, thank you.

GENERAL FLYNN:

Well, you know, maybe one of the things that we do because when I’m trying to do too, when I’m out and about this country, is I’m trying to take military terminology, not soften it, but adjust it to civic action, right? Because there’s a lot of similarities. And so people get afraid when you start talking about, you know, military terminology, and you use it too much and they “oh, you know, he’s trying to, it’s like this.”

No. Actually, what I’m trying to do, is I’m trying to make people understand that this was a coup of our country and it was a takeover and, as Paul and I had the conversation about our military, our military is now, are they now, the question is, are they now part of it?

And I think that we now have a culturalization that has occurred in our military as well as has occurred in our entire education system. Because our military, you know, is a function of that education system. And I can tell you that what gives me the ability to still feel strong about our military is our non-commissioned officer [NCO] corps because we still have enough non-commissioned officers and are ready to stand up. But they will support their chain of command if it’s moral, legal, and ethical.

And I think, more and more, where the left made its mistake is they overdid the COVID thing. And with people dying from taking this vaccine, you know, even Ben Carson, who is very close to the President, Ben Carson came out in the last 24 hours and said he is totally against it and he recommends no children take this vaccine at all. And the reason why is because people are dying from it. If you’re an adult and that’s what you decide to do, you’re an adult and that’s what you decide to do. It’s your business. But you better be prepared for the consequences and you better research what’s in this damn thing.  And so they overstepped that element of control and takeover, and the American people are not going to be fooled by it. Not going to be fooled by it.

So, God Bless you guys. Thank you so much, and I’ll come back on.

NAVY SUBMARINE VETERAN DON SMITH:

Great!

GENERAL VALLELY:

Well, we’ll get you back on. What we are dealing with is an incapacitated president, a totally clueless vice president there. That worries me a lot too, especially over the next 10 to 12 months. Looking at the damage that has been caused just in the first 10 months of this year, and then all of the RINOs that say “well, we’re going to wait until 2022,” look at the damage that can be done in the next 10 months.

GENERAL FLYNN:

The establishment Republican Party is done. They are worthless. And we need to find fresh blood, fresh ideas, American ideas. There is nothing the matter with putting America first. If America’s first then the rest of the freedom-loving world will be right there with us.  

GENERAL VALLELY:

Absolutely. Well, thank you Mike, and we’ll be back in touch.

NAVY SUBMARINE VETERAN DON SMITH:

Thank you so much. God bless.

COPYRIGHT 2021 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES

 

General Petty Of STARRS Tells John B. Wells How Neo-Marxism And Critical Race Theory Are Destroying The US Military: Caravan To Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, November 5, 2021

0
GENERAL CHRISTOPHER PETTY - CARAVAN TO MIDNIGHT - THE AMERICAN REPORT

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones  | The American Report | November 7, 2021

U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.), Vice President of External Affairs at Stand Together Against Racism and Radicalism in the Services (STARRS), joined host John B. Wells on Caravan to Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, Release Date November 5, 2021, to discuss how neo-Marxism, critical race theory (CRT), and the Biden Defense Department’s policy of applying so-called ‘equity’ in order to achieve ‘equal outcomes’ are systematically destroying the U.S. military and present a “national security threat to American military readiness.”

“Socialism and communism always ends in mass killings, starvations, gulags…

…The problem for the military is, and it’s kind of a theoretical problem of neo-Marxism, the problem of the military is this does significant long-term damage to the effectiveness of our fighting force. It divides. It segregates.” 

“When you start putting adjectives in front of justice, she’s no longer blind.”

— U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.), Vice President of External Affairs, Stand Together Against Racism and Radicalism in the Services (STARRS)

Stand Together Against Racism And Radicalism In The Services (STARRS)

STARRS LOGO

A November 1, 2021 STARRS press release explains:

The genesis of STARRS, Inc. began when a small group of interested individuals viewed a three-minute United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) football team coaches’ video promoting Black Lives Matter (BLM). “The video was naïve and an unintended endorsement of a Marxist political organization, Black Lives Matter, and we discovered the invasion of this poisonous neo-Marxist ideology was occurring across the Services,” said Rod Bishop, Lt Gen, USAF (Ret), STARRS Board of Directors Chairman & President.

U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.): Official Biography

U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.)
U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.)

STARRS Website: https://www.starrs.us

Christopher J. Petty graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1987. After flight school, he was assigned as a platoon leader in the aviation company (C 3/159th) supporting operations at the National Training Center at Ft. Irwin California.

General Petty served in key command and staff positions throughout his career, both on active duty and in the National Guard. He served as a commander for a combined eleven years at the company, battalion, brigade, and joint/multi-national levels—a highlight of which was his command of the 2-135th Aviation Battalion during the “Surge” in Iraq.

His unit distinguished itself by performing over 100 large-scale, nighttime, air-assault operations, in support of the Theater Special Operations Task Force. Despite numerous enemy engagements, resulting in 2 aircraft shot down and 1 destroyed by enemy mortar fire, he brought everyone home. For its exemplary combat service, the unit would earn the Meritorious Unit Citation, along with the national-level “Outstanding National Guard Aviation Unit of the Year Award” presented by the Chief of Staff of the Army.

His general-officer assignments included command of the NATO Headquarters in Bosnia, Special Assistant to the Director of the Army National Guard, and Deputy Director of Operations for Headquarters Department of the Army (DA G-3/5/7) in the Pentagon, where he personally briefed the Secretary of the Army and members of the House Armed Service Committee on various operational and readiness issues. In his final assignment, he served as the Deputy Director of Operations for United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) where he managed Ballistic Missile Defense, Information Operations, Intelligence and Reconnaissance Operations, and various contingency operations for the command.

General Petty holds Masters degrees from both the US Army War College and Colorado State University. He is a graduate of the National Defense University’s Joint and Combined Warfighting School and the Chairman’s Capstone and Advanced General Officer Education Programs. He has completed senior-executive training at both Harvard’s Kennedy School and Wharton and is a National Security Fellow at Syracuse University. General Petty has lectured at the Army War College’s Center for Strategic Leadership, the United States Coast Guard Academy, and various national-level forums and conferences.

General Petty is an airborne, ranger, instructor pilot, master aviator. His awards include 2 Defense Superior Service Medals, 2 Legions of Merit, 6 Meritorious Service Medals, the Bronze Star, and the Air Medal, among others. He has flown over 2600 hours in Army helicopters, 356 of which were in combat.

He and his wife, Beth, have four grown sons and four grandchildren and live in Parker, Colorado.

Caravan to Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, Release Date November 5, 2021 Featuring Special Guest U.S. Army Brigadier General (Ret.) Christopher J. Petty With Host John B. Wells (PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT)

BRIGADIER GENERAL CHRISTOPHER J. PETTY - CARAVAN TO MIDNIGHT - NOVEMBER 5, 2021 - 1280

The following is a partial transcript of Caravan to Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, Release Date November 5, 2021 Featuring Special Guest U.S. Army Brigadier General (Ret.) Christopher J. Petty With Host John B. Wells:

JBW:

I understand there is a problem that a lot of the general officers seem to share, and that is the incursion of Marxism, not communism, but Marxism, into the military, and not just one or two branches, but all branches.

GENERAL PETTY:

John, we have a real problem, and people are starting to wake up to it but it’s been a little slow because the military is a tougher nut to crack. But as you said, racist and radical ideologies are really infiltrating the military in a big way.

Most people have been following the progression of these things in universities and the entertainment industry and media, and corporate America has recently kind of fallen, if you will, for an analogy there.

But now it’s rapidly infiltrating the military, especially in the last few years. And your listeners know well these neo-Marxist theories and propaganda, things like critical race theory, antiracism, white privilege, gender identity groups, social justice, all the social justice derivatives.

People are starting to recognize the problem, they are starting to wake up. I think you saw on the civilian side you saw some good news out of these recent elections. Parents are waking up and getting involved in local school boards and saying “enough is enough.”  But, that’s the good news.

The bad news is the military is a tougher nut to crack. There’s lots of bureaucratic inertia, people are really burrowed in in some of these key assignments and staff positions and political appointees, and you also have an administration that really supports this stuff, so it’s a tougher nut to crack, but it is a real national security issue that people need to be aware of, they need to understand the scope of the problem, and why this problem is such a national security threat to military readiness.

JBW:

And this is actual Marxism. I didn’t know, I had to take a look at this, but the difference between communism and Marxism is Marxist socialism involves a dictatorship of the workers and state control of society. Once communism was implemented in the socialist country, everything would change.  But communism was a utopian state where there was no class, money, private ownership, or even government. So Marxism is way worse, I’m thinking. What do you think?

GENERAL PETTY:

Right. Marxism kind of came first, in a sense, and really, to boil it down, Marxism is nothing more than “we must destroy the system in order to rebuild the utopian system,” and there was no construct, it was the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, and the proletariat would destroy the system and take control and redistribute and build their utopia.

Now, how this manifests itself in today’s neo-Marxist is, we can trace the evolution in America and on some of this I don’t want to get too esoteric, but the neo-Marxist today has essentially said, you know, I’m really generalizing here, but has essentially said “well, class warfare didn’t work so well in America so let’s find something else that is going to be effective — ahh — race — race is an achilles heel of America. There’s an unearned guilt that we can play on and we can use race and some of the other derivatives — gender identities and things — to divide people into groups, and tear apart the existing hierarchy — it’s all about the existing hierarchy — you have to tear that down and then we can rebuild society, we can rebuild society in the utopian image that we are striving for.”

I mean, that’s it in a nutshell. But now, it’s morphing into things like critical race theory. And critical race theory is really an offshoot of the critical theory, the original critical theory. It began in the seventies, and it was after this civil rights era, these proponents thought it didn’t quite translate into equal outcomes, the civil rights era and the legislation and the laws and all of the work we did in the sixties. And their conclusion was: color-blind laws are insufficient. We need laws that target racial groups to create equal outcomes. I mean that’s kind of the kernel of truth of the truth as they believe it in critical race theory. It rests on some really bad assumptions, like race is a social construct — it is not a biological reality — and racism is systemic, woven into all institutions. These are key assumptions, and “whites hold the privilege in the system.”

So, the assumptions are based on really anathema  and opposed to everything America has been striving for and everything America stands for. But it is creeping in, and it is creeping in rapidly.

JBW:

This is actually quite something. So, the thing is, as far as the utopian problem goes, not everyone is going to go along or agree with somebody else’s vision of utopia, unless it’s just blind obedience to the most respected leaders. So, I’m thinking if not everyone is going to go along with utopia, sooner or later there will be blood. What do you think?

GENERAL PETTY:

It always seems to end that way, doesn’t it? I mean, socialism and communism always ends in mass killings, starvations, gulags, I mean, you name it. You can see what is happening in Venezuela, in our hemisphere. It always ends the same because one person’s idea of the utopia doesn’t match everyone else’s and it always creates that same system of haves and have nots.

But the problem for the military is, and it’s kind of a theoretical problem of neo-Marxism, the problem of the military is this does significant long-term damage to the effectiveness of our fighting force. It divides. It segregates. It makes people suspicious of other groups. It teaches them that one skin color is inherently oppressors, and another skin color is inherently oppressed.

This changes the entire dynamics in a military that is built on unity, trust, and cohesion which are vital for putting together a team that is going to go do dangerous things. So, I mean this is really a cancer and it’s growing and we at STARRS, and I really encourage your listeners to check out www.STARRS.us and see what we are tying to do here because it is a worthwhile mission, it needs to be done, and it needs to be done soon before we reach some kind of tipping point where we can’t even recruit idealist young Americans to go do good things.

JBW:

Inevitably, I have to step on this stone. So many people want to flee from the spiritual aspect of things. But, it seems to me, that absent God and spirituality directed toward a creator God, well it seems like all bets are off because our job here on Planet Earth is to do the best we can until we get actually where we are going. Well, these people seem to want it, this is where it stops, there is nothing beyond the earth, there is nothing to you beyond your body and therefore to get into all of that religious stuff, particularly Christianity, is just anathema to their idea of a utopia, which to me is the very first law.

Do you agree with that, and maybe the other part of it is, your interpretation of their definition of what social justice actually is.

GENERAL PETTY:

Social justice. I mean, who doesn’t want to be for social justice, right? But, if you look at the word justice, though, it stands by itself. Justice is blind. Lady Justice is blind, OK?

When you start putting adjectives in front of justice, she’s no longer blind.  So, somebody’s idea of social justice will be very different than somebody else’s idea of social justice.

In the context of today and the neo-Marxists, social justice is purposely discriminating against the oppressors, which, in this context, are the white people, to create equal outcomes for other races, and in some cases, genders. That really is social justice in a nutshell.  Sounds nice, though, doesn’t it, social justice, how can I be against that?  That’s part of the trick. That’s part of the trick. They do it with everything.

Another great example is the word “equity.” We’ve been hearing a lot about that lately. When I was growing up, equity meant ownership. “I have equity in a house, equity in a business, sweat equity,  those kinds of things. Now, equity means — again, a word that sounds wonderful — how can you not be for equity, and yet equity means, today, in this current construct, equity means equal outcomes, which is far different than when we grew up. Equity now means “we will discriminate against you based on skin color and gender or sex to create equal outcomes.”  That’s what equity means today, which, by the way, has a military  … are really, really scared of this influence, because of course, if you take equity to its logical conclusion, you have destroyed a meritocracy, and if you destroy a meritocracy in the military, now you have a force that is not confident in leaders, because leaders will now be seen as, well that leader, who happens to be black, now my commanders, “well, he was probably a, you know, a social justice equity hire.”  We don’t need that. We have great black commanders.  We have great black leaders. They need to stand on their own like they did twenty years ago, ten years ago, as I was growing up in the military. There wasn’t any question if they were a diversity hire. They were there because they were the best and we all knew that.

Listen To The Entire Program: Caravan to Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, Release Date November 5, 2021

LISTEN HERE TO THE ENTIRE BROADCAST of Caravan to Midnight Live Naked Lines Friday, Release Date November 5, 2021, featuring special guest U.S. Army Brigadier General Christopher J. Petty (Ret.), Vice President of External Affairs at STARRS:

https://www.caravantomidnight.com/episode-detail/21853

COPYRIGHT 2021 MARY FANNING AND ALAN JONES

 

 

U.S. Scientific Traitors, Driven By Greed, Are Betting On The Success Of China

0

By Lawrence Sellin and Anna Chen | November 6, 2021

Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that COVID-19 could not have evolved in nature and, therefore, must have been created in a laboratory, it came as no surprise that U.S. intelligence agencies released an inconclusive report about its origin.

The U.S. intelligence agencies are part of a permanent U.S. federal bureaucracy, which is controlled by a rich and powerful few, who are profiting enormously from their collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party.

Similar to the Chinese Communist Party’s use of China and the Chinese people, the oligarchs do not consider the United States a nation, but simply a land and people to exploit.

Those rich and powerful few hire Democrats and Republicans and other stooges willing to sell out America for cash.

Like Judas goats, who lead sheep and cattle to the slaughter, U.S. traitorous elites are helping the Chinese Communist Party plunder America and kill Americans.

The tale of Xiang Gao is illustrative of that point. He is a Chinese Communist Party scientist, who was involved in the transfer of vital American biotechnology to China and the use of that biotechnology in China’s biowarfare program.

XIANG GAO - NANJING UNIVERSITY

Xiang Gao received his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees from Nanjing University in 1985 and 1988, respectively.

As we shall see, it is perhaps no coincidence that Nanjing is also the headquarters of the People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command, which was involved in some of the key research leading to COVID-19.

Xiang Gao completed a Ph.D. in 1994 at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. Before returning to China in 2000, he received six years of postdoctoral training in the United States at the Roche Institute of Molecular Biology, The Jackson Laboratory in Maine, and the University of North Carolina. The last being the institution of Ralph Baric, known for his coronavirus gain of function research and collaboration with the “bat woman,” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The most consequential time Xiang Gao spent in the United States was his two years (1995-1997) at The Jackson Laboratory, the world’s source for more than 8,000 strains of genetically defined mice and home of the Mouse Genome Informatics database.

Xiang Gao would subsequently reproduce The Jackson Laboratory at Nanjing University as its Director of the Institute of Model Animals.

Later, Xiang Gao worked with People’s Liberation Army scientists, such as Xiliang Wang, who is a research collaborator with many of those linked to China’s biowarfare program.

XILIANG WANG - AMMS - PLA

Genetically-altered mouse models, a biotechnology pioneered by The Jackson Laboratory and now widespread in China’s military research centers, was a technique critical to the creation of COVID-19.

Pre-adaptation for human infection can be achieved in the laboratory by repeatedly exposing bat coronaviruses to genetically-engineered mice that express the human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor (ACE2), a process known as serial passage.

According to Tao Wang, General Manager of Jiangsu Jicui Yaokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. in Nanjing, U.S. scientists Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina and Stanley Perlman of the University of Iowa donated their ACE2 genetically-engineered mice to China.

Although the Baric and Perlman mouse models adequately express the human lung ACE2 receptors, they did not fully express human ACE2 receptors found in brain, heart, kidney, and the gastrointestinal system.

Chinese scientists built upon the Baric and Perlman mouse models creating a genetically-engineered mouse that fully expressed the human ACE2 receptors, thus simulating the human infection to a greater extent.

It is important to note that Xiang Gao is a founding member of Jiangsu Jicui Yaokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., which has been partially funded by the Chinese Communist Party.

XIANG GAO - GEMPHARMATECH

Jiangsu Jicui Yaokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. has also received funding from the U.S. investment firms Morgan Stanley and Hillhouse Capital Group, the latter founded with seed money from the Yale University Foundation.

The new name for Jiangsu Jicui Yaokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is  GemPharmatech, which recently began operations in the United States with CEO Mark W. Moore as the “American face” for a company actually controlled by his Chinese national subordinates, Gann Xu and Zhiying Li and Xiang Gao in China.

GemPharmatech U.S. will house more than 6000 mouse models in Massachusetts and California, directly competing with The Jackson Laboratory and other U.S. companies.

In April 2021, GemPharmatech signed an agreement with the University of California Davis, which also has its own controversial links to Chinese Communist Party scientists.

The principal investigator of the University of California at Davis’ PREDICT program, funded with $200 million from the U.S. Agency for International Development, was the “bat woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Bottom Line – U.S. traitors, driven by greed, are betting on the success of China.

(Hat tip to Anonymous)

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com. Anna Chen can be followed on Twitter @2020Gladiator

 

1234...30Page 3 of 30

EDITOR PICKS

POPULAR POSTS

POPULAR CATEGORY

© 2015 - 2022 THE AMERICAN REPORT